1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BabaBlast [244]
2 years ago
15

How is the communism of the Cuba similar to Marx’s ideas? How is it different from them?

History
1 answer:
joja [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In the first place, it must be said that despite his immense intellectual contributions and his deep analysis of 19th century capitalism, Charles Marx didn´t leave any book or writing outlining how a communist society would look like. He only wrote once that in communism, every person will go from receiving according to their capacity to receiving according to their needs. This is a very vague idea. So, is Cuba true to Marx? It´s hard to say. Paramount leader Fidel Castro built a Communist Party and a communist state following the Soviet model. In orthodox Marxist practice, the government is the dictatorship of the proletariat, of the workers. What we have actually seen in Cuba is a dictatorship of Fidel Castro and his brother Raúl Castro, in which they and a small elite of top party, state and military officials hold power exclusively.

Prosperity in Cuba? Definitely no. The Cuban experiment is a failure after 60 years of communist rule; the Cuban economy is not dynamic, it is dominated by the higly ineffective state-run mammoths, many Cubans live in nearly-poverty, food rationing continues, it is tecnologically backward. No democratic freedoms. Most young people want to emigrate and settle in the US or elsewhere. The traditional Soviet-like economic model, a command economy, is a system that can´t create wealth and can´t lead to prosperity because its ideological foundations are wrong; only an economy based on a free-market and private enterprise can generate and sustain wealth. The American embargo is usually blamed by Cuban leader as the main reason for this situation, but Cuba can import technology from other countries, trade with them and get investments. So, why does it continue to lag behind?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Assessment: Introductory Paragraph & Thesis
bixtya [17]
I think that This is correct, the very reason for English settlers coming to U.S is haphazard. They came here in search for religious freedom from the British crown, and forced there way onto America. From then on they have used the land, gotten sick and died, searched for treasure destroyed the land and fought with Indians. The situations that brought them to settle in America and their dissensions afterwords set the building blocks for an extremely haphazard way of life. They killed many Indians made treaties and broke them, mined the earth for oil and made war with Brittan 2 times. Also their greed for money and industrialization was also out of control. All in all the settlements of early America, was forced due to oppression and was never gilded into a thoughtful manner. 

All this needs is specific detail which i can't do since i don't have your book or curriculum.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the political impact of the development of farming?
Furkat [3]

AnsweAgriculture allowed farmers to use genetics to select the best crops for their areas. Agriculture also enabled the population of Pre-Columbian America to increase. People could now live in permanent villages. In time, these villages created their own systems of governance.Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
The belief that the U.S. should extend all the way to the Pacific Ocean because it was God's will
natita [175]
The idea is Manifest Destiny
6 0
2 years ago
Do any of you guys watch xqc?
LenKa [72]

Answer:

whats that ..... .......¿

oh i gottit on Google

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The destruction of the "Southern way of life" was not caused by the loss of slaves, but by the loss of capital and destruction o
poizon [28]

The answer was False.  It was not the loss of slaves but the loss of their source of economy and riches when the Union under the command of General William T. Sherman marched into the South and destroyed every factory, building and farm effectively crippling the South’s capability to produce weapons and supplies for its troops.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify one way that the US job market changed after World War II?
    6·2 answers
  • Who won the battle for Stalingrad during World War II?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Marbury versus Madison Case change the role of the Supreme Court
    15·2 answers
  • Describe two major federal assimilation policies
    10·1 answer
  • Why would the act of nullification have weakened the union?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was Thomas Paine piece directed to
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important for there to be checks and balances?
    14·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Why did hitler turn his attention to the Baltic region
    8·1 answer
  • What was the original name of the peanuts comic strip?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!