True because in the north back when they were discovering new diseases and tragical events which had to seperate them for a little bit
Answer:
The principle reason was the cost and the general public's opinion of the war back home in England. The war was amounting an insane amount of debt and resources and the people of Britain were tired of the war and protested its existence. Britain didn't have the morale boost of patriotism and a war worth fighting for like the Americans did.
Explanation:
The massive turmoil that the Reformation caused had a lasting impact on European politics. Soon after the Catholic Church deemed Martin Luther a “protestant,” Europe became divided along confessional, as well as territorial, lines. The religious turmoil of the period led to warfare within most states and between many.
<span>
if direct democracy means (pure) democracy then it means that every
citizen would get a chance to vote on issues instead of what we have in
the US: a representative democracy where we vote in politicians to do it
for us. A pure democracy would lead to civil war most likely b/c too
many people would be able to disagree, anarchy would be a likely
result,....so i would say D is your answer </span>
Answer:
Both were equally important.
Explanation:
We cannot deny the importance of the two men mentioned above when we think about the creation of the Pakistani state and the feeling of nationalism among the people of that region. While Allama Iqbal was the great architect of Pakistan and a great activist in the name of the sovereignty and rights of that nation, Chawdry Rehamat Ali was a great thinker and poet where he embraced political issues and exaggerated the Pakistani sense of nationalism. This sense of nationalism was essential to the independence of Pakistan, designed by Iqbal to be a reality. In this case, we can say that both are extremely important.
