<span>Since a peasant owns little property and works in the employ of a landowner or business owner, he or she would have little concern for the loss of property and be less concerned if the flow of products is disrupted. He or she would also have more incentive to invest in a revolution that upended the status quo and allowed for more mobility within the social and economic hierarchies. The merchant would be invested in quelling any rebellion that would interrupt the economy and cause destruction of property and good.</span>
Answer:
There is no solutions to this problem.
Because when you solve it you get an untrue statement. When this happens, it means that there is nothing that can make it true.
Explanation:
3x + 13 = 3(x + 6) + 1 use distribute property
3x + 13 = 3x + 18 + 1 combine like terms
3x + 13 = 3x + 19 subtract 3x from both sides
13 = 19
Answer:
CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE .... This may explain the diuretic action of the latter drugs, since PGE2 produces diuresis ... of functional activities of natural and synthetic agonists, and antagonists were ... A possible mechanism of prostaglandin action in follicular rupture is shown in Figure 6.
Explanation:
Answer:
It relies on assumptions about the context.
Explanation:
Took the exam. It is the right answer!
Top-down is how we percieve and process from experience.
Answer:
B.
Capybaras live in groups of 10 to 20, and there is usually one male in each group who is the leader (Pilgrim 4).
