Why were the Articles of Confederation unable to provide stability for the United States?

Advanced Placement (AP)

2 answers:

lana66690 [7]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation did not actually unify the states. Each individual state saw itself as independent and worked for its own best interest. Additionally, the Articles did not create any national army or government that could help solve conflicts between states. This meant that while the states were loosely connected, there was no way to ensure that there was peace between them. Thus, stability across the country could never be achieved under the Articles.

AlladinOne [14]2 years ago

4 0

The US had no power to enforce law, or text states, which was needed because the US agreed in the treaty of Paris that they would pay off their debt to Britain, they also had no way to deal with foreign countries

You might be interested in

There are 10 fish in a fish tank 5 fish died and 2 swam away how many fish are left in the fish tank

Ivanshal [37]

[brainly] 10 fish boiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Technician A says that to prevent the machine from starting by accident when you're working on it, disconnect the ignition syste

shutvik [7]

answer A. both technicians.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who wants to be off homework 50 points!? Come and get the points.

dem82 [27]

Answer:

I do ig

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What reasons did the Supreme Court give for changing lifetime sentences to youths and How did states react to the changes in law

maxonik [38]

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy proclaimed that juveniles that are convicted even of the most heinous crimes should not be treated in the same way as adults. The court back in 2005 eliminated the capital punishment for juveniles and subsequently said that they could not be imprisoned for life for crimes other than murder and their hope living outside prison must be restored. Justice Kennedy also mentioned that, “children’s diminished culpability and heightened capacity for change” cast doubt on mandatory sentences, and that this “harshest possible penalty will be uncommon.”

The aforementioned change spread quickly across the nation, with individual state, where most juvenile justice issues are settled, which are using the same course of actions that are especially designed to rehabilitate juveniles, so much as the most grave cases. However, new change happened all over the United States when it comes to the treatment and arbitration of juveniles related to delinquency and criminal matters over the past twenty years .

5 0

2 years ago

WILL MARK BRANLIEST PLS HELP

Advocard [28]

Answer:Consumer Behavior & Geographics

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago