1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lidiya [134]
3 years ago
13

Explain ONE reason that people may desire to migrate away from metropolitan areas

Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
Illusion [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

One reason that people may desire to migrate away from metropolitan areas is an overcrowding population.

Explanation:

While living in a metropolitan area has many benefits (career and education opportunities for example) most people end up leaving because the busy atmosphere isn't for them. Whether there is a lack of sanitation from overcrowding, noise at all hours of the night, or the size of the population isn't desirable.

I'm also going to assume this is for AP Human Geography, a test I took a few years ago and passed :)

You might be interested in
A simple index of three stocks opens the day with these values
joja [24]
I think it’s C but not a 100% sure... but hopefully you get it right
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Farming practices that increase production levels through the use of chemical fertilizers and technology to compensate for a sma
klemol [59]

Answer: The correct answer is INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE or INTENSIVE FARMING.

Explanation:

INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE also called intensive farming is a system of agriculture whereby there is increased use of capital and labor to increase production in comparison to the available land.

The aim of intensive farming is to maximize yields from the land available through different means. Examples of such means include; heavy use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the hominids australopithecus and homo erectus
MaRussiya [10]
Humans are members of the genus Homo click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced. Modern people are Homo sapiens click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced. However, we are not the only species of humans who have ever lived. There were earlier species of our genus that are now extinct. In the past, it was incorrectly assumed that human evolution was a relatively straightforward sequence of one species evolving into another. We now understand that there were times when several species of humans and even other hominins were alive. This complex pattern of evolution emerging from the fossil record has been aptly described as a luxuriantly branching bush on which all but one twig has died off. Modern humans are that last living twig. Complicating this evolutionary history even more is the realization that our ancestors very likely mated successfully with members of other closely related species from time to time. As a consequence, our inherited gene pool was enriched by added genetic diversity. This sort of genetic mixing has recently been documented for Neandertals and early modern Homo sapiens living 40-60,000 years ago. It is also likely that there were genetic bottle necking events that periodically reduced our diversity. That largely accounts for the fact that despite our huge human population today, we are remarkably similar genetically compared to other primate species. It also explains why we are now the only surviving hominin species.

The striking similarities in appearance between the human genus Homo and our ancestors, the genus Australopithecus click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced, is sufficient reason to place us both into the same biological tribe (Hominini click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced). Both genera are bipedal and habitually upright in posture. Humans have been somewhat more efficient at this mode of locomotion. Like australopithecines click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced, early humans were light in frame and relatively short. They were only about 3 ft. 4 in. to 4 ft. 5 in. tall (100-235 cm) and weighed around 70 pounds (32 kg) The evolution of larger bodies occurred later in human evolution. The differences between australopithecines and early humans are most noticeable in the head. Humans developed significantly larger brains and relatively smaller faces with progressively smaller teeth and jaws. In addition, humans became ever more proficient in developing cultural technologies to aid in their survival, while the australopithecines did not.
5 0
3 years ago
Roman food was completely different from the food we eat today.<br><br> True<br><br> False
Julli [10]
The answer is True..
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements correctly explains the role of fossil fuels in the production of energy?
blondinia [14]

Answer:

  A. The combustion of fossil fuels heats water to produce steam, which then turns a turbine.

Explanation:

Most heat-based generation of electricity uses steam and steam-driven turbines to actually turn the generator. This includes coal, oil, gas, and nuclear power, and some solar power as well.

The heat source is used to heat water, turning it to steam. The steam is then directed at a turbine, turning it and the attached generator to produce electricity.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Gina has $5,000 saved and wants to attend a college with a current tuition of $10,000 a year. She will graduate from high school
    9·1 answer
  • What are some ways oceans vary from each other?
    10·1 answer
  • How much energy is produced when the sun converts 2.8 kg of mass into energy? Answer in units of J
    11·1 answer
  • What are more likely to evolve on islands specialist or generalist
    12·1 answer
  • Examine the structure of the early Christian church. What challenges did the church face? Relate the rise of the church to Roman
    8·2 answers
  • When a star burns its fuel at a faster rate, late in its life, the extra energy flow causes what to happen?
    15·1 answer
  • Describe Weather in 3 to 4 lines.......
    11·1 answer
  • Biologists estimate that a randomly selected baby elk has a 46% chance of surviving to
    15·1 answer
  • The benefits of flextime include
    7·1 answer
  • Language is an example of *
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!