There are lots of articles can be found on the internet about the negative impact of a democratic society to the citizens.
Find the links below:
1. The Green Garage Blog
Link: http://greengarageblog.org/16-significant-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-democracy
- It provided not only the disadvantage of democracy but also the advantages. According to this article, an example of disadvantage of democratic government is the misuse of public funds.
2. Mind Controversy
Link: http://www.mindcontroversy.com/disadvantages-democracy/
- Compare to the first article, here, it only tackles on the disadvantages. It points more on the possible corruption of the leaders.
3. Quora - Disadvantages of Democracy
Link: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-disadvantages-of-democracy-1
- In this article, it provide answers to questions about disadvantages of democracy.
Answer:
Feudal lords controlled castles and had military strength that allowed them to create social and political order in vast areas. In several cases, the concentration of power and wealth in the hands of feudal lords allowed them to build some sort of powerful states. However, the fragmentation of political power paved the way for many dangers, like wars, invasions, and famine.
Explanation:
Feudalism is the denomination of the predominant political system in Europe and the Middle East during the Middle Ages, characterized by the <u>decentralization of political power</u>. By relying on the diffusion of power from the cusp (where the emperor or the kings were in theory) to the base where local power was effectively exercised with great autonomy or independence by an aristocracy, called nobility, whose titles derived from governors of the Carolingian empire (dukes, marquises, counts) or had another origin. Feudalism responded to the insecurity and instability of the time of the invasions that were happening for centuries. Given the inability of state institutions, far away, the only security came from local authorities, lay nobles or ecclesiastics, who controlled castles or fortified monasteries in rural settings, converted into new centers of power in the face of the decay of cities.
Feudalism allowed the Lords to concentrate a great power and wealth in vast areas, which in time would derive in the creation of powerful states. It also led to constant conflicts and wars among several feuds. Since there was no clear higher power above the feudal lords, it created a fragile and unstable social and political order that paved the way for wars, invasions, and famine.
Shakespeare is known for a lot of famous work of literature. The one among the options that best accomplishes this goal is In sentence 11, adding “(equivalent to a modern-day mayor)” after “bailiff".
- The passage centers around scholarly work talking about historical developments in indigenous art
The writer's aim to alter the passage for an audience to know more about historical period of Shakespeare’s time.
Conclusively, by using the term above, it can make the audience to become more familiar with the work.
Learn more about Shakespeare from
brainly.com/question/7592021
Answer:
essay below
Explanation:
Government plays a large factor in today's society and has a lot of control over it. Government should be monitoring and changing today's society in a positive way.
The first souce indicates that the government allowed children to work in dangerous conditions, and it was unhealthy as a whole towards everyone who worked there. This was later changed after laws were passed.
The second source shows food insecurity among Inuit Children, the government is needed in areas like these to help support their civilians.
The third source shows equality towards all, now while this is not present throughout the societies of the world and sometimes even governments, this is something that the government should contribute in.
Overall, I suggest that the government should be helping modify today's society and it's problems, such as homelessness, going hungry, healthcare, worker's rights, etc.
They stressed the direction of all human activity toward the goal of increasing the power of the ruler and the state.
