Answer: Start = $300 million
End = $318.59 million
Explanation:
NAV can be calculated by dividing the funds Assets net of Liabilities by the total number of outstanding shares.
At start of the year NAV is $300 million and NAV per share is therefore,
= 300 million/ 10 million
= $30 per share.
Ending NAV
During the year the fund made Investments and increased by a price of 7%
= 300 million (1 + 0.07)
= $321 million
We still have to subtract the 12b-1 fees that the fund charges though and that would result in,
= 321 million * (1 - 0.0075)
= 318.5925
= $318.59 million.
Dividing this by the total number of outstanding shares we have,
= 318.59 /10
= $31.86
$31.86 is the NAV per share at year end.
Answer:
A. positive cash flow of $ 20 comma 900 from investing activities
Explanation:
book value - sales price = loss on sale
30,900 - sales price = 10,000
30,900 - 10,000 = sales price
sales price = 20,900
Assumming the purchase was on cash, it will be disclosure as cash generated from investing activities for 20,900
The reason is that cashflow do not focus on the gain or loss from the sale. It focus on the cash movements and this sale involve a cashinflow of 20,900
Answer:
A beginning of a great business
Explanation:
Not for sure that the answer
Answer:
28,000
Explanation:
To get this answer you have to assume perfect competition scenario, since in this case supply = demand. In this case:
At $7,5
Energizer sells 16,000 => Supply Energizer = 16,000
Duracell sells 12,000 => Supply Duracell = 12,000
Total Supply = 16,000+12,000
Answer:
a) Distinguish between the use of Franchising and Joint Venture as modes of entry into other countries by global businesses.
Franchising consists in the licensing of aspects of production and intellectual property to a another party: the franchise.
A Joint Venture is a business union between two or more parties, in which they split profit as well as costs and responsabilities.
b) What are the respective advantages and disadvantages of both strategies?
Franchising can be a quicker way to expand into foreign markets. The flexibility of the method, and the lower capital requirements are the reason why. This can be seen in the success that American fast-food brands have had using this method to expand in global markets.
A Joint-Venture can be more difficult to use for market expansion, however, it can be more profitable, because the profit will not be split among as many parties as in franchising, and more importantly, the firm maintains a higher control of the operation.
