Answer:
Lawmakers who made the Dred Scott decision
Explanation:
Chinese-American railroad workers wanted more rights as well and bisexual and transsexual Americans due to the fact that they are minorities. The 19th amendment gave more rights to the citizens of America regardless of their race or sexuality. The decision that was made about Dred Scott ( who was a minority) was that Dred Scott was not a citizen and therefore did not have the rights of one, meaning that they are most-likely to agree with the idea that there should be barriers to minorities achieving equal rights.
Answer:
It is disheartening and saddening to see majority of our students with no morals. I suggest we should instil our codes of conduct in everything we do. Any student that fails to abide by the rules governing the school should be punished. There should be no nepotism from the teachers and all the students should be judged fairly
Answer:
Explanation:
It is important because if we don't them all students will then just assume since they aren't in school they could do whatever.
Answer:
On July 13th, a federal judge permanently prohibited the heartbeat law in the state of Georgia from taking effect. The heartbeat law would have stopped abortion, except for some exceptions, after a heartbeat is detected in a fetus.
The federal ruling said the heartbeat law was unconstitutional and violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
The heartbeat law has always faced controversy and criticism from pro-abortion advocates who argued that the heartbeat bill was restrictive on women who wanted an abortion and that many women were unaware they were pregnant until the heartbeat could be detected.
This heartbeat law is not about the restriction on women who want an abortion but protecting the rights to life of the unborn child.
We want our laws to be able to defend and uphold morality, and equality and it is saddening that when laws like these are put in place, it is said to be restrictive on women. If anything, the prohibition of the heartbeat law is an attack on unborn children who have their rights taken away.
This law has nothing to do with partisan politics as I am pro-life and worked with Republicans and Democrats when drafting this law.
According to Judge Steven Jones, is the heartbeat law truly unconstitutional? It is completely reasonable to consider the heartbeat of a fetus as a sign of life and the Constitution exists to protect such a life.
So far, the federal court has made a ruling but Governor Kemp has made it clear he would file for an appeal and I hope that when it matters most, more thought would be put for the dignity and rights of the unborn rather than partisan narratives.
Rev. Dean Nelson is the executive director of Human Coalition Action.