The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the authors of the declaration partially succeeded in providing a perfectly unbiased account of the king's actions. However, when reading the text of the Declaration, you can notice some biased when using adjectives and sentences that describe the King of England's offenses to the American colonies.
For example, I want to share the following evidence from the text. The following excerpt of the Declaration: <em>"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."</em>
When you read it, you can notice the kinds of words Thomas Jefferson used to disqualify the decisions of the British government. Words lie "abuses," "usurpations," and "despotism," are strong words that were chosen by the framers of the Declaration to appeal to the emotions of the colonists.
Because they thought it would break national unity and the that the economy would suffer without free labor
Answer:
Explanation:
Allowed food production to increase and create healthier diets, Inventions in technology increased clothing production to make prices of clothing more reasonable, inventions in transportation enables people to travel across for distances, Urbanization, increased workers income to purchase more.
The problem with the Gautreaux Assisted Housing Programs is
that if the participants that are to participate or are going to be participate
with the program are either self selected or they are either randomly chosen by
the person responsible of picking the participants.
A
It’s impossible to punish a journalist due to criticism! It’s freedom of speech . The rest of the answer option has nothing to do with Amendment one !
