Answer:Yes.
Explanation: The following scenario can be stated as a partnership.
As a partnership is an arrangement where both the parties are mutually benefited and also share equal amount of powers between them.
As the person agreed not only to fund the project but also had the power to control the progress of the project.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
Do you still need this answer?
Explanation:
Answer:
a person not having to pay a certain tax because of the location of their second home
No i would not recommend going to court because i'm sure if he has the money to get a lawyer then he should have the money to replace his damaged goods
Hope this helps :)
