Yes because if the car is old and gets totaled you would want insurance to get some money back from your old car to put towards a new one
Yes Because its your fault your gonna need to pay for their damages. ( i live in Florida so ion know much bout that cause we a no fault state )
Answer:
No. A Police Chief should not promote an Officer with special skills to a supervisory position.
Explanation:
There is a rule for succession. A Police Officer must have served a certain time in rank, and pass a test to be considered. Anything outside of this would have needed to be approved by a higher level of government or it could be seen as preferential treatment which is an ethics violation. Police officers usually become eligible for promotion after a probationary period.
To be a police officers you have to follow a special code of conduct and behavior, making it much different from other professions. The job of a police officer requires much mental toughness, physical fitness, and a level of ethics and morals not every individuals have. In order to for an officer to be promoted into a supervisory position, I feel that the officers up for advancement needs to be able to show a good track record of conduct and behaviors. I feel this can only be achieved through time spent “in rank”
The patrol activity he is participating is Administrative duties
Administrative duties is the way in which a person carryout his or her day to day job duties or assignment such as:
•Sending mails
•Receiving phone calls
•Preparing reports
•Preparing memo
•Ensuring that files are well organized etc.
Adminstrative skills include:
•Comunication skill
•Listening skill
•Ability to Multitask
• Organization skill etc
Performing or Carrying out Administrative duties enables day to day smooth running of company or organization operation.
Inconclusion The patrol activity he is participating is Administrative duties .
Learn more about Adminstrative duties here:
brainly.com/question/7512252
Answer:
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
Explanation:
John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.
However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.
This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.