You didn't provide a list of choices, but I'll provide a key example: The US intervention in Korea. In Korea, when communist forces from the North invaded the South in 1950, the United States intervened (with United Nations backing), battled to keep South Korea free and democratic, and were able to do so. The Soviet Union did not play an active, open role in that war, but did covertly supply <span>material services to the North Korean side, as well as Soviet pilots and aircraft. Keeping communism from spreading in Korea was a way the US was practicing its policy of containment over against Soviet communist influence.</span>
-<span>world's longest human made structure at more than four thousand miles actually
</span>-co<span>nstructed from a series of smaller walls that were connected together built
</span><span><span>
-to guard against Mongol invaders</span></span>
For the American people to pursue their dreams. Also it was a chance for America to gain its own culture and own look apart from England
Answer:
The Inca government controlled its economy by: Making all people work for the government.
Explanation:
Option C is your answer. Have a great day.
I would say no because if we look at economics, it is REALLY expensive to maintain a large country (this case empire) because there would simply be too many people to manage for one governing body (so I would presume a governing body and not a dictatorship). Is an "American Empire" the face of globalization? No.
