1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elan Coil [88]
4 years ago
11

What conclusion can be drawn about this scene based on

English
1 answer:
lidiya [134]4 years ago
3 0

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

A few minutes later, Luma arrived. Members of the Under Fifteens and Seventeens were warming up when she walked onto the field past Fornatee, without making eye contact. Luma blew her whistle and told the two teams to gather at opposite ends of the field.

"She's more than a coach—that's why," Fornatee said, almost to himself. "She's a great person. I'm going to go over there and tell her, 'That's my team.'"

Fornatee hesitated. I asked him if he was nervous about talking to Coach. He laughed anxiously, then composed himself.

"Nah—I'm not nervous," he said.

What conclusion can be drawn about this scene based on the narrator's decision to write in the first-person point of view?

Answer:

The narrator experienced this event in person.

Explanation:

The narration that uses the point of view in first person is a narration made by a character of the plot telling what he witnessed and the experiences he lived in a certain moment of his life. That way we learn about the events that occur in the narrative through the character's perspective, what he saw and what he felt.

In this case, we can say that when the narrator used the point of view in the first person, he wanted to show that he lived this experience in person.

You might be interested in
SÚPER EASY HELP ASAP FIRST TO ANSWER GETS BRAINLIEST
Furkat [3]

Answer:

For example, in writing an essay, the interest lays in making a point. In general, an essay communicates with a general audience. Writing a speech requires that a writer communicate a specific theme or topic to an audience. It uses a tone that produces an emotional effect on the audience.

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which key details from "R.M.S. Titanic" best support the central idea that wealth was a determining factor in who survived?
Dvinal [7]
I’m pretty sure it’s C. and D. Hope I helped
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A technique of taking an audience back in time during the action of a play is called ______.
gregori [183]
A technique of taking an audience back in time during the action of a play is called flashback.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why does the narrator in Langston Hughes's short story "Why, You Reckon?" agree to rob a white person? A) He has a criminal past
viva [34]
The main reason why the narrator in Langston Hughes's short story "Why, You Reckon?" agrees to rob a white person is because he <span>has been treated badly and now hates white people. The reader is able to empathize with this. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Examine the following passages to determine whether they contain arguments. For those passages that do contain arguments, rewrit
My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on.  He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.

2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder.  The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again:  identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.

3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment.  (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person.  Therefore,  (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write a one paragraph analysis on the cartoon above. Answer correctly and you will be marked as brainliest.
    9·1 answer
  • What is one essential element of historical fiction
    14·1 answer
  • Someone plz Answer plz
    6·2 answers
  • Pleas help, I attached a image
    6·1 answer
  • Choose have or has. Mother and father____good children
    5·2 answers
  • ANSWER ASAP PLSSS WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    6·2 answers
  • Anyone looking for a boy?
    10·2 answers
  • lines 85-90: analyze the irony in these lines. how does this moment in the story demonstrate dramatic irony?​
    11·1 answer
  • Give a description of human trafficking (2018-2020) example of how this problem has displayed itself in your community​
    6·1 answer
  • Many decisions affect our lives. Sometimes we make decisions; other times the decision is made for us. Write about
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!