1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
2 years ago
7

How is an executive agreement different from a treaty?

History
1 answer:
Leni [432]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legallly binding.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Please help
aniked [119]
1. Britain refused to stop seizing american ships that traded with france, which is britain’s enemy.
2. strongly agreed
3. it changed the course of american history because they had won the war against the biggest and strongest army at that time, it embedded a greater sense of nationalism
4 0
2 years ago
War between Bismarck and the Danes.. A) Danish War. B) 7 Weeks War. C) Franco-Prussian War.
SpyIntel [72]
Its A. The Danish War 
6 0
3 years ago
30 easy points please help
hodyreva [135]
Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution empowers Congress to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.” Article I, Section 9, further states that “No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.”
8 0
3 years ago
"What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be neces
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

This statement by James Madison argues that men are not perfect, and that human nature can be flawed. He believes government exists in order to control and limit the impact of these flaws.

One example is the separation of powers. The principle of the separation of powers states that power must be divided among different branches of government. The branches limit and control each other, and safeguard against the abuse of a tyrant. If people were not corrupted by power, or did not have a tendency to abuse power for their own gain, then the separation of powers would not be necessary. However, because human nature is flawed, these measures are necessary in government.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Good evening! Can someone please answer this, ill give you brainliest and your earning 50 points. Would be very appreciated.
Alika [10]

Answer:

Option A

Explanation:

What is appeal?

  • Appeals means to apply in higher courts for justice
  • They can overrule the decision made by lower courts .
  • So district court is lowest in system hence it's decision can be overruled
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Factories and mills in the early nineteenth century employed women and children as well as man which statements are true about w
    13·2 answers
  • What's the difference between Temperance and prohibition
    9·2 answers
  • What weather conditions could make trees grow more slowly than normal
    15·1 answer
  • How did the cultivation of winter wheat help create the dust bowl in the Great Plains?
    15·2 answers
  • The Yellow River is located at . The structure built to keep out the northern barbarians was called the and is located at . The
    12·1 answer
  • Why is it difficult for the federal government to increase or decrease its spending
    11·1 answer
  • Please help!
    7·2 answers
  • What is hanging gardens of Babylon
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following quotes from this excerpt best explains Hitler's justification for the extermination of Jews in Germany?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the 1939 cash-and-carry amendment to the Neutrality Acts favor Britain over Germany?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!