The likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.
<h3>What is deed?</h3>
In law a deed can be defined as a document that entails the agreed terms and conditions of a land ownership between two people or two or more people or parties.
Based on the given scenario if the mother brought an action against her son wife after the dead of her son based on who the title of the farm belongs to, the mother might likely win the case because her son never accepted the deed of the land ownership.
Therefore the likely reason is that: the son never effectively accepted delivery of the deed before he died.
Learn more about deed here:brainly.com/question/4729037
#SPJ12
Answer:
Violations of the First Amendment
Explanation:
Given that the First Amendment of the United States protects the right of the people to the freedom of assembly. Hence, any form of restriction of the teenagers from assembling in public spaces, including the local mall would be considered as a violation of the first amendment.
Hence, in this situation, the possible constitutional violations this ban could create is that of "First Amendment"
First off answer D is logical but is expected however just by remaining calm doesn’t mean you’ll handle the situation so in order to actually handle a situation you call 911 obviously. Trick question, completely unspecified.
