Answer:
Muckraker, any of a group of American writers identified with pre-World War I reform and exposé literature. The muckrakers provided detailed, accurate journalistic accounts of the political and economic corruption and social hardships caused by the power of big business in a rapidly industrializing United States.
Explanation:
The answer is C) to demonstrate the importance of subconscious thoughts.
Answer:
D. 4.5 billion years
Explanation:
Scientists study meteorites to determine the age of our solar system, since they are the oldest accessible material out there. Earth itself has rocks that are over 4 billion years old.
In recent times, meteorites have informed our view of, and our priorities about, what spacecraft – and perhaps, one day, human explorers – might find on Mars and other planets. And we now recognize that a cosmic delivery of life with an independent origin from our own would revolutionize our ideas about the extent of life throughout the whole known Universe.
Answer:
welp i cant leave this blank lol ill just put in explanation
Explanation:
what YOU can do is start a inclusive club (LGBTQ club that sorta stuff) in your school or make it a community group and draft letters to your officails to find a way to stop bigotry in your state/area. what ADULTS can do adults can run for offices and change or add rules they can also provide funding for groups that kids made.
Answer:
A: A concurring opinion agrees with the majority opinion; a dissenting opinion disagrees with it.
Explanation:
Dissenting opinions serve several purposes. They can help to achieve an appeal review of the case by the full court or by recovering the case materials, verify and clarify issues for a subsequent appeal. With their help, it is possible to achieve the adoption of legislation to make up for possible shortcomings in the rule of law. Dissenting opinions can also help narrow the scope of the decision by pointing out the possible dangers of the majority position, or inform other judges and the bar attorneys about the limitations of any decision and its effect on similar cases in the future. Thus, dissenting opinions can serve as a useful tool in bringing important information to the attention of those interested in judicial decisions and to promote the development of law
.
Concurring opinions are appropriate when they are aimed at achieving greater accuracy in the issue of the impact of the decision, or in this way informing the parties and other audience about important points in the opinion of the author. Thus, judges can give concurring opinions in the case when there are two reasons for the decision, and the majority justifies its decision only on the basis of one of them, and the other judges consider that alternative reasons must also be indicated. The concurring opinion shall include an indication of the reasons for agreeing with the majority opinion. The point is not to present an alternative opinion to the majority opinion, but to indicate the point of difference with it and further outline the contours of the decision.
