Answer:
The answer is that <u>The Burmese do not want the British in their country.</u>
Explanation:
Shooting the Elephant is a novel story by George Orwell which helps in showing the effects of colonialism on both the colonizer and the colonized. This story likens the actions of the british coloniser towards the Burmese people despite the fact that the where not wanted.
Orwell, feels a similar ambivalence towards the elephant that he was about to kill as he does towards the Burmese locals whose liberty has been restricted as result of being entrapped and shackled.
<em>The principal cultural conflict is that, the British does not want to leave the Burmese people, not because they never wanted to (being aware the Burmese people never wanted them as a colonizer ) but the fact that they don't want to look weak in the eyes of other countries, hence the reasons the persistently decided to stay in Burmese as a colonizer. </em>
"There is no effective way to stop gossip" is the statement among the choices given in the question that <span>best describes the phrase “Changing the subject is a good way to avoid gossip.” The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "d". I hope it comes to your help.</span>
Villain: they are fighting after a glorified “hero” killed their little sister in a casualty while fighting some other villain. Years of disgust and hatred for so called “hero’s” rotted their heart. there Super power is mind control / telekinesis and they were given it during the blast that killed their sister (hope this helps!! please Mark branliest :))
Answer:
Jacob Frey, mayor of Minneapolis — the city where it all kicked off, where George Floyd was so brutally killed by the police — Jacob Frey, a young, liberal Democrat, a former civil rights lawyer, turned up to to join a protest against police brutality and show solidarity with his black constituents. But it didn’t go so well for him when he was asked in front of the entire crowd, by the organizers, whether he was willing to go beyond the usual platitudes about police ‘reform.’Explanation: