Answer:
A. Will be the nine month period between August 15 and May 15; any time period longer than this will be long run for her.
When an economist makes a prediction that a rise in consumer incomes will increase the demand for bicycles sold by a bicycle company, it is made on assumption that bicycles are normal goods. Therefore, the option A holds true.
<h3>What is the significance of normal goods?</h3>
The normal goods or services being sold in the market of an economy can be referred to or considered as goods that have a direct relation with the demand for such goods, which are affected by consumer income.
As per the behavior of normal goods, it can be inferred that their demands increases with a given increase in the disposable income of the consumer, such as the one in the condition given above.
Therefore, the option A holds true and states regarding the significance of normal goods.
Learn more about normal goods here:
brainly.com/question/24100151
#SPJ4
An economist for a bicycle company predicts that a rise in consumer incomes will increase the demand for bicycles. This prediction assumes that bicycles are _____.
A. Normal goods
B. Luxury Goods
C. Inferior Goods
D. None of the Above
Primary care physician are health professionals who take care of patients who have the same medical conditions. Primary care physicians are usually involved in their patient care for a long time. All age group of people can be cared for by primary physician, depending on the type of care that is needed. For example, pregnant women are usually cared for by gynecologists.
That is not a question it is a statement. However yes, businesses tend to increase the price of an activity the more customers react positively to the activity.
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
