1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
azamat
3 years ago
8

Why did the Allied leaders begin to hold conferences starting in 1943? Check all that apply.

History
2 answers:
Alchen [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

1,4,6

Explanation:

Paraphin [41]3 years ago
4 0
<span>The conferences began with the Tehran Conference in 1943 and the Allied agreed on opening a second front. so it is correct:

to decide on strategies to defeat the Axis powers

Also discussed post-war settlement. so both of below are true:

to make plans for the post-war world

to decide what would happen to Axis territory after the war

</span>
You might be interested in
Can you please help me with all of this
RUDIKE [14]

Genghis Khan was a leader with lot of great qualities, and he is regarded as a great leader, one of the greatest in history in fact.

Explanation:

Genghis Khan was a Mongol ruler of the Mongol Empire. He managed to unite the Mongol tribes and make them the greatest power of their time. Genghis Khan also set the foundations for the formation of the largest empire that the world has seen until then, only to be surpassed in size by the British Empire few centuries later.

This Mongol ruler possessed many great qualities. He was very wise, excellent tactician, loved his people, was establishing peace on the conquered territories, encouraged people of ethnic and religious backgrounds to collaborate and coexist. It is very interesting that Genghis Khan can be seen bot as a nationalist and as a liberal, from modern perspective of course.

His nationalist tendencies are seen in the fact that he loved his country, he loved his people, and he made sure that every Mongol has all of the basic needs for life secured. On the other side, his liberalism can be seen in the fact that he had nothing against people of other ethnic, cultural, and religious backgrounds, but instead he was encouraging all people to put their differences aside, collaborate, and help each other for the benefit of everyone. All in all, Genghis Khan was an excellent leader, and a model as to how many other leaders should have been in that period of time.

Learn more about the Mongol Empire brainly.com/question/11288396

#learnwithBrainly

7 0
3 years ago
"Scientific" racism was used to justify negative attitudes toward both slaves
Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

The Continent of Africa

Explanation:

In both Europe and many parts of the New World was the belief on a scientific notation that people from the African continent were somehow inferior specimens of Homo Sapiens.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was important about the location of the Alamo
defon

Answer:

It was first occupied by Spanish and then Mexican soldiers. Its importance as a military settlement and proximity to San Antonio drew the attention of Texian forces during the Texas Revolution

Explanation:

AYEE LOOK AT ME IMMA BLOW UP ONE DAY you want my yt ask me i gotcha u

3 0
3 years ago
Essay Question: Did imperialism have more positive or negative effects on the United States? Be sure to use at least two pieces
tamaranim1 [39]

Answer:

Effects of Imperialism -

Imperialism is when a mother country takes over a smaller nation or colony for political, social, and/or economic reasons.  Imperialism has been a major force in shaping the modern world.  The effects of Imperialism have been interpreted from a variety of viewpoints.  This major Imperialism occurred during the late 19th Century and early 20th century.  It had more negative effects in the modern world today then positive effects.

A positive effect is seen in document one called "Modern Progressive Nations," it shows how the larger nations gave to the smaller colonies.  The nations built them roads, canals, and railways.  Showed them the telegraph, newspaper, established schools for them, gave them the blessing of their civilization, and overall made them economized.  They were part of modern culture after this occurred.  Another positive effect is seen in document three called "Colonial Governments and Missionaries. " It shows how the colonial governments introduced improved medical care, and better methods of sanitation.  There were new crops; tools and farming methods, which helped, increase food production.  These changes meant less death to smaller colonies, and overall improve the state of living.  They now could live longer and have better sanitation compared to the earlier imperialism.

A negative effect is seen document two-called "Colonization."  In the picture you can see that the colonies doing the mother countrys hard work did not civilize the smaller colonies.  They were put to work as cheap labor.  They had no freedom, had to do what the mother country said since it has so much towering power over them, they were exploited and were taken advantage of.  Another negative effect is seen in document four called "Missionaries."  In this quote you can see that when the white people came to the Africans they had nothing but power over them.  They came with the Bible and no land, and instead took their land and forced the religion Christianity upon them.   In document five-called "The White Man," another negative effect occurs.  In this little tale or quote, David Diop talks about how the whites came and killed the innocent.  This had many negative effects on Africa such as the African's were put to work as slaves but more like cheap labor.  Many of them dies from this, they were resettled, exploited, weren't taken at their free will and took all of their land.  The last negative effect can be seen in document seven called "The German Cartoon." This cartoon shows how severely the presence of imperialism affected such continents as Africa.  The man in the machine is being forced to drink hard liquor and alcohol, they were corrupted and given evil minds, their money was all taken away, and most of all religion was forced upon them.

Imperialism is never considered as a good cause and effect.  At first when it occurs it may seem as a positive effect, but in the long run, for example in this case it was a negative effect.  All Africans and Asians were heavily exploited and were given no rights to do anything even though the mother countries gave them modern culture.  Colonies inside colonies would fight because they wanted independence and have their own government and rule.  There were many ethnics group that had nationalistic feelings but could not accomplish anything and become a free nation because of Imperialism.  The mother country's that did the taking over were only after a few things and unfortunately did happen to accomplish what they were after.  They wanted raw materials, markets for goods, national glory, balance of power and they also felt as though they needed to help smaller nations as though it was their burden, which Europeans called "White Man's Burden."  In their point of view they thought they were helping people but really all they were doing was hurting the smaller colonies.  Mother countries were destroying ethnic groups and causing civil wars between smaller nations.  This newer modern Imperialism was never productive.  

When a mother country took over a smaller colony for economic, political or social reason, they were Imperialistic.  As shown they changed the modern world plenty and pretty much made it a harder world to live in at that time.  It all depends on which viewpoints you may look at.  Some may think it was a positive thing but overall, it only led to things in this world that were negative.  Even thought the modern Imperialism occurred no more then 100 years ago, it still affects us greatly, and how our nation is broken down.

Explanation:

there's your essay

7 0
3 years ago
Place these events in chronological order.
REY [17]

The Monroe Doctrine on December 2, 1823. The OAS on April 30, 1948. Fulgencio Batista on January 1, 1959. The Bay of Pigs Invasion on April 17, 1961. The Cuban Missile Crisis on October 1962. The Ban Treaty on August 5, 1963. Fidel Castro on Oct 3 1965.

What is chronological order?

Chronological order refers to the arrangements of events according to the time they occurred

The Monroe Doctrine is created on December 2, 1823. The OAS is established on April 30, 1948. Fulgencio Batista rises to power in Cuba on January 1, 1959. The United States launches the Bay of Pigs Invasion on April 17, 1961. The United States and the Soviet Union face off in the Cuban Missile Crisis on October 1962. The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union sign the Limited Test Ban Treaty on August 5, 1963. Fidel Castro establishes a communist government in Cuba on Oct 3 1965.

As a result, option (g), (a), (d), (c), (b), (e), (f)  these events in chronological order.

Learn more about on Soviet Union, here:

brainly.com/question/10173240

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did religious beliefs in sumer make the government more powerful?
    14·1 answer
  • 5. Why was King Louis XIV known as the “Sun King?"
    7·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP
    8·2 answers
  • How long is a representative's term of office?
    14·2 answers
  • How did the US victory at Wounded Knee influence American control of the west?
    8·1 answer
  • According to douglass, what knowledge was kept from slaves?
    5·1 answer
  • How did Samuel Morses creation change America?
    10·1 answer
  • What did the United States and George Washington want to maintain during the European conflict
    12·1 answer
  • Hello I really need help for my history homework if you could help me that would be so wonderful
    14·1 answer
  • basahin nang malakas ang mga sawikaing nabuo mula sa larawan. Ibigay ang kahulugan ng bawat Isa. 1.taingang Kawali 2.pusong mamo
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!