What damage did the u.s. military inflict on the japanese?

How could a station in hawaii help the U.S military ?

Masteriza [31]

A military station in Hawaii would allow for the US to have a Pacific base on American soil. Some of America's largest enemies are in the East (China and North Korea) and a military base in the Pacific would allow us to have more control over the area, while still being on American soil. Being on US soil will allow us to have better access to supplies and logistics, as well as avoiding any problems with the allied nations that we would have to set up base in otherwise (such as problems the military faces with their bases in Okinawa).

6 0

3 years ago

1. Lincoln decided to go to war against the Confederacy after which event?

tatuchka [14]

1. Lincoln decided to go to war against the Confederacy after b. The Capture of Fort Sumter.

2. a. Having better generals and soldiers was NOT an advantage of the North during the Civil War.

3. The Monitor and the Merrimack were c. ironclad ships introduced during the Civil War.

4. The Emancipation Proclamation c. freed all slaves behind Confederate lines.

5. The Civil War ended at a. Appomattox Court House.

6. The raw material used to form steel was c. iron.

7. The following new invention changed life for many Americans during the Industrial Revolution: c. none of the above.

8. The truth about the transcontinental railroad was b. It created more opportunities for farmers.

9. Labor unions were formed to c. protect workers from dangerous working conditions.

10. The following immigrant attempted to take control of the steel industry: c. Andrew Carnegie.

11. Immigrants came to America c. in search of religious freedom or improvements in their current economic situation.

12. The majority of immigrants came to the United States from b. Eastern and Southern Europe.

Thus, the first shots of the Civil War were at South Carolina's Fort Sumter, while the war ended at Vi-rginia's Appomattox Court House.

Learn more about the American Civil War at brainly.com/question/897234

#SPJ1

4 0

2 years ago

The 1957 eisenhower doctrine empowered the president to extend economic and military aid to nations of __________ that wanted he

d1i1m1o1n [39]

It would be the middle east

7 0

3 years ago

Which correctly describes Hitler's final solution?

Charra [1.4K]

A plan to exterminate all the Jewish people in Europe

3 0

3 years ago

You may argue that it is impossible for two contradictory interpretations to be correct at the same time. Or you might point out

Ulleksa [173]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question seems incomplete and lacks context, reference, or specific question, we can say the following.

It is understandable to think that is not possible that two contradictory interpretations can be correct at the same time. That is why they are considered contradictory. But what it is interesting using logical thoughts is that if we consider that there are interpretations can be correct in many different ways. Everything depends on the belief systems and education of the receiver. There could be two people that interpret different things from the same statement. And yes, this is possible because the educational background and experience of people are different. What can be good for one culture, can be bad for another culture.

3 0

3 years ago