1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iragen [17]
3 years ago
13

What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?

History
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

You might be interested in
PLEASE ANSWER FAST PLEASEEEEEE
miss Akunina [59]

Answer:13 of Great Britain's North American colonies threw off British rule to establish the sovereign United States of America, founded with the Declaration of Independence in 1776.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What did the Sons of Liberty do in response to the passage of the Stamp Act?
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

Explanation:    

The first major action of the Sons of Liberty was to protest the Stamp Act. They took direct action by harassing the stamp tax distributors who worked for the British government. ... Their protests worked and the tax was soon repealed by the British government.

7 0
3 years ago
Among other crimes committed in those parts you have mentioned this, that certain of the faithful sell their slaves to the pagan
Fantom [35]

Answer:

The first option

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
The native people would give Columbus’s crew
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Anything they possessed

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the Ottoman Empire contribute indirectly to the start of world war 1
Snezhnost [94]

The Ottoman Empire contributed indirectly to the start of World War I by Balkan calls for independence, which contributed to instability in the region.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do the United States and other nations primarily cooperate economically?
    11·2 answers
  • What is written at the bottom of the Statue of Liberty?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the processes behind sub-saharan africa’s political map, and why have there been relativelyfew boundary changes since t
    12·1 answer
  • What was alfred insulted by other scientists when he shared his theory at the conference in new york?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following places would you expect to have the coldest climate?
    10·2 answers
  • Alexander introduced __________ culture to all of the areas he conquered.
    12·1 answer
  • Bakit kailan natin ng buwan ng wika
    5·2 answers
  • What might happen if you were on the wrong side of Stalin?
    5·1 answer
  • How might patterns of trade and cultural diffusion have differed if Rome, not China, had learned the secret of making silk??
    15·1 answer
  • Under the Mandate of Heaven, how would Heaven show that an emperor was not being a good leader?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!