1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iragen [17]
3 years ago
13

What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?

History
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

You might be interested in
Look at the map showing the Austria-Hungarian Empire in about 1900.
Anon25 [30]

The map on the Austria-Hungarian Empire shows that Austria-Hungary was home to many different ethnic groups.

<h3>What was the population of Austria-Hungary like?</h3>

Austria-Hungary was populated by several ethnic groups which made it quite complicated to govern.

There were Germans and Austrians, Hungarians, Serbians, Bosnians, and Czechs. The empire therefore had several ethnic groups.

Find out more on Austria-Hungary at brainly.com/question/24213561.

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
PART 2<br> What role did propaganda play in these events? ( the events of the Boston massacre)
AnnZ [28]
The Boston Massacre was concidered to be propaganda, because what it honestly was, was a mob (of about 10 people) gathered outside of the King's Safe House and there was [a sa … id] misunderstanding about someone yelling fire, and the British killing 5 people.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the 1920s move America in s different direction than the decades or eras of the past ?
Elena-2011 [213]
Answer my question I’ve posted it 5 times plz
6 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me with this? &lt;3
nlexa [21]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

arts philosophy and culture where reborn during the rennisance and renisance means rebirth

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following shows the influence of the U.S. Constitution on the Texas Constitution?
Alchen [17]
The answer is A
I am
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Answer parts a, b, and
    8·1 answer
  • What is a governing body responsible for making laws
    5·1 answer
  • As chicanos became urban and rural wage workers,what problems did they confront?why was Mexican labor so important?in which indu
    14·1 answer
  • Which was allowed to free African Americans in the South during the 1840s and 1850s.
    14·1 answer
  • How did mercantilist policies create tension between Great Britain and the
    12·2 answers
  • In 1 or 2 sentences, explain the effects of lower interest rates on consumption and investments.
    9·1 answer
  • Was JFK a strong supporter of civil rights for African Americans? Why or why not?
    9·1 answer
  • Discuss the developing relationship between Britain, France, and the former Ottoman territories of the Levant after between 1919
    7·1 answer
  • What decision was made by The First Continental Congress?
    14·2 answers
  • Who made the decision to drop the atomic bomb on japan.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!