James Madison's theory treats freedom of expression as an intrinsic feature of democracy. In this way you should not use the pretext of "defense of democracy" to silence a man because you disagree with him, even if he is a fascist.
We can cite as evidence the power relationship between the king or president and the people. Freedom of expression does not exist for the tyrant to be silenced, but for him to speak and we can answer him.
This statement by James Madison argues that men are not perfect, and that human nature can be flawed. He believes government exists in order to control and limit the impact of these flaws.
One example is the separation of powers. The principle of the separation of powers states that power must be divided among different branches of government. The branches limit and control each other, and safeguard against the abuse of a tyrant. If people were not corrupted by power, or did not have a tendency to abuse power for their own gain, then the separation of powers would not be necessary. However, because human nature is flawed, these measures are necessary in government.
Answer:
The society organized peace conferences and regularly published a periodical entitled Advocate of Peace. The Society was only opposed to wars between nation states; it did not oppose the American Civil War, regarding the Union's war as a "police action" against the "criminals" of the Confederacy.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
If the leader you chose was Mohandas Gandhi, then let's talk about him.
Mohandas Gandhi was considered by some people as a villain because many people died and many others spent time in prison by participating in the movement organized by Gandhi.
Another argument is that many people think that Gandhi led the conspiracy against Bhagat Singh, and finally, he was killed.
Finally, another controversy created by Gandhi was the selection of his heir. He chose his successor in the person of one of his closest pupils, Nehru, when many people believed that Sadar Partel had more experience and skills to become the leader.
