Some of the points which a staunch traditionalist can give in favor of his beliefs are:
- The way of doing things in the past was better and there was better morality.
- The people lived longer and were healthier.
- There was more accountability.
- There was a stronger sense of family and bond.
<h3>What is Modernity?</h3>
This simply refers to the new ways of doing things that are considered better than the older, more traditional ways of doing things.
Hence, we can note that a staunch traditionalist would be of the view that modern ways of living and behavior has been detrimental to not only families, as there has been high rate of divorces, but also that moral decadence is the order of the day.
Read more about traditionalism here:
brainly.com/question/24507709
Answer:
The economy of Australia is a highly developed market economy. Its GDP was estimated at A$1.69 trillion as of 2017. ... The Australian economy is dominated by its service sector, comprising 61.1% of the GDP and employing 79.2% of the labour force in 2016.
HOPE IT HELPS✌
Answer: Alexandria Hatcher
Explanation:
The building of living things is called
answer : a cell
Answer:
The right option is:
- <u>Consider only whether the terms of the agreement were fair at the time the agreement was entered</u>.
Explanation:
Prenuptial agreements are regularly used to protect the inheritance of children in a previous marriage, prevent the fruit of work of one of the parties being divided once there is an early break (usually occurs in case of marriages by interest) or prevent the debts of one of the parties involve the other party, however, you should always keep in mind that it is a legal contract and that if one of the parties does not agree with them, you should not sign them, however, in case <u>if a legal trial is filed on the basis of a prenuptial agreement, the judge beyond the assets that would be left to one of the parties or that would leave the other destitute is concerned about the terms in which said agreement was signed, is In other words, if both parties had the knowledge of their legal implications, they were of legal age at the time of signing them, some kind of trick was urged or not to deprive the other of what belongs to him, among other things</u>. terms that must be verified by the judge when making a decision.