Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
Answer:
a because you just adding
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
68,000,000
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the hundred thousands place. If it's a 5 or higher you round up and if it's lower you round down. Since there is 4 in the hundred thousands place you round down. Everything to the right turns into a zero.
Answer:
1. D
2. H
3. D
Step-by-step explanation:
1. It is y=mx+b m is slope and b is Y intercept
2. You make it to be in y=mx+b you find the slope and you find where Y is
3. An easy but tedius way is to go to all and plug in the numbers (x,y) or you can first find the slope with the slope formula
