The economic value of having colonies in the first place was for 3 main reasons
1) attain cheap labour from the native peoples
2) acquire cheap raw materials to bring to the homeland (Europe)
3) open up new markets to trade with
the first two were vital in Britains industrial revolution. Without cheap raw materials, and cheap labourers, the factories and refineries in Britain would have costed far more to maintain and keep supplied. This, in turn, would have slowed down production considerably. There is no doubt in my mind that the industrial revolution would still have taken place in Britain with or without the colonies, but WITH the colonies the process was sped up considerably.
Overall, cheap labour and raw materials attained through Britains colonial interests sped up the industrialisation of the UK.
It gave the Supreme Court the power to use judicial review
Answer:
<h2>hieeeee</h2>
<h3>I don't get yr 1st line!</h3>
<span><span>1. </span><span>Nullification doctrine is said that the
states residing within the Union is undocumented. Supposed Aliens and sedition
acts was passed to punish those who opposed the federal laws and regulations. However,
it was Thomas Jefferson who thought that this act may affect the Bill of Human
rights, so he decided to make an equally unconstitutional doctrine that states
if a government would implement a law, a state could refuse to follow it. John Calhoun, soon adapted the Nullification
doctrine</span></span>
Business owners should be held responsible for the employee injuries that occur in job. Business owners should beforehand see to it that the working environment is safe and it is the employee's sake that they should prioritize among others. So, the answer is letter D.