1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
likoan [24]
3 years ago
6

The policy of social intervention by govt to empower the poor and the deprive *should be discarded* inline with Herbert Spencer

theory of social Darwinism. Respond to this statement *considering the situation of the poor and the deprive* in your country.You may want to look at the argument against the livelihood empowerment against poverty LEAP program in Ghana.
History
1 answer:
sattari [20]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The first argument that can be used against such measure is that the theory of social darwinism developed by Herbert Spencer has been largely discarded in the social sciences. The theory has no scientific validity, and no school of sociological or economic thought adheres to it.

The second argument is a moral argument: all people have dignity no matter whether they are rich or poor, and the poor as worthy of respect as the rich. In modern democracies, governments help the poor because poverty is seen as a negative consequence of many factors that play in a society.

From this two reasons, the argument in the question can be refuted, and the conclusion is that government programs that help the poor should be supported.

You might be interested in
In the 1820s, the United States was concerned about European ambitions in the Americas because it feared Europe wanted to
Mademuasel [1]
The correct answer is B. Conquer new Latin American republics. 
In the 1810s, a series of revolutions broke out in Latin America, resulting in nearly all of Latin America being independent by the end of the 1820s. These new republics could be conquered by European nations, and Russia had expressed their desire to expand down the Pacific Coast. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a major political change after the Civil war?
sertanlavr [38]
States did have more rights after the civil war 
8 0
3 years ago
A result of the gibbons v ogden decison was that states?
avanturin [10]

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court decided that the US Congress had the power to regulate commerce between the states.

4 0
3 years ago
Bar chart titled: Population Growth in New York City, 1800-1890. The chart shows a bar for 1800 which is pink totalling 79,215.
weeeeeb [17]
Between 1800 and 1890 the population increased by 2,428,199 people, so the closest answer to the problem would be 2.5 million people<span>.

Let me know if this is incorrect. Hope this helped! :)
It is completely up to you if you want to give me a brainliest or not :)</span>
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The american political process in which citizens elect individual to represent them in the legislature was Inspired by the
Reil [10]
Enlightenment thinkers, John Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did the civil war affect the races around america
    14·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers.
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these events happened last? A. The U.S Civil war begins. B. The British colony of Jamestown is founded. C. The United S
    5·1 answer
  • Relationship with family, friends and community far outweighed money or things
    6·2 answers
  • A type of jurisdiction that state and local trial courts have is
    11·2 answers
  • The first cross-state railroad ran from cedar key to
    9·1 answer
  • Panuto: WOW SA PAG-UNLAD. Anoangmgapatunayna may
    13·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of communication innovation?
    9·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS FOR THE CORRECT ANSWERS
    10·1 answer
  • How do you stay informed about political issues
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!