I believe the answer is: Closeness of the relationship
People on average had a 'barrier' that we put when we socialize with other people. We would let people pass this barrier after they somehow earn our trust. From the example above, the coworkers haven't yet pass this barrier, which make us more likely to be suspicious on every gesture that those coworkers made (even if they are truly genuine)
Gotcha and not with those textbook definitions.
Lets say we own a herd of goat. I dont even know if you can have herd of goat or if its called something but back to the point,
In a democratic society, every goat would have an equal chance to represent who they want to be their rancher. They can express their views openly without any legal prosecution. However, they dont just choose one person to lead them. Lets say that theres a group of white colored goats. These goats can vote for one goat to represent them as whole. Same with the brown-colored goat. Same with the black-colored goat.
(And no, please, if someone takes this as racist then I am done. That is not what im going for)
Now an autocratic society has the rancher with absolute power (like a dictator). He can control everything to his needs and he does not need to benefit the majority of the people, only the people that will keep him in power (which is why there is no such thing as a Dictator that will help the people. If he does help the people, he loses the support of his closest allies who had him in power, and he is now tossed out of power).
Finally, an oligarchic is a bit harder to represent with goats but lets say we had some European Goats and some American Goats who used to be European. They decided to sail across the sea to find "new land" and start there own government... But of course, that European Goat sees the American Soil that the goats now herd on as having lots and lots of grass, which is depleted in Europe due to the large amount of Goats. They decide to create a charter to grant the American Goats rights to the land only if they send grass back home.
I hope this helps people understand these concepts as I just really came up with the metaphors for it and wow, I already love my own post
Answer:
an equitable relationship.
Explanation:
The equity theory suggests that the distribution of the resources should be done fairly in both partners. The theory was first theorized by John Stacy Adams in the 1960s. The distribution of resources are calculated by comparing contribution and benefits. This theory helps to find a fair balance between all the employees by distributing resources as per their contribution.
In the given case, Aidan and Jacob are receiving their salary as per their contribution. Aidan, who is the CEO of the company contributes and gives input to the company of 10 hours whereas Jacob works for 5 hours.
So, they both are receiving their salary according to the equity theory and thus they share an equitable relationship.
The correct answer is letter D.
Explanation: The creators of the Game Theory were John von Neumann, John Nash, and Oskar Morgenstern. It is a framework for conceiving social situations among some competing players. In some respects, game theory is a science of strategy, or at least the optimal decision-making of independent and competing actors in a strategic setting.
