Yes, absolutely!
Primary sources document the events as they happen, as opposed to secondary sources that "re-tell" the story. So a photograph on an event is a primary source for it, yes.
The audience is experiencing narcotizing dysfunction if fails to take action after seeing prolonged reports on natural disasters or human rights violations.
<h3>What is narcotizing dysfunction?</h3>
This is the theory that has it that people may lose their apathy to certain issues based on the fact that the media is outspoken on those particular issues.
This theory tells is that people may begin to care less about certain issues that are serious because much light has been shed on those issues.
The audience has seen so much reports on the issues of natural disaster till they have started to show little concern about it.
Read more on human rights violations here:
brainly.com/question/1274113
#SPJ1
When the colonists became rebellious to British policies, the government was forced to repeal the Townshend Acts as a consequence.
Before this though, the British government sent troops to Boston, which resulted in hostility from the colonists, ultimately leading to the Boston Massacre.
I think that the best answer is "nation" but sometimes the word "nation"also refers to people without recognised borders, such as the Kurdish people or Jews before the establishment of modern Israel.
