We need to control the inflow of people to the countries especially when the economy is tanking. The influx of illegal trespassers had eaten up millions of jobs that would otherwise go to legal citizens who have come in good faith through proper channels. You wouldn't want people making decisions for your country (voting) who aren't apart of your country. That would basically be like asking a stranger where you should eat every time you were hungry. We need rules to regulate what goes on in our country so we can keep everything in order and under control.
A <span>key difference between the earliest works of history, such as homers the odyssey and modern works of history is that modern works are far more objective, and truthful. Ancient works of history used to greatly embellish facts for the sake of entertainment. </span><span />
I think that this question was asked by a bot made by brainly.
Both want a change from being ruled by an absolute ruler, both have economic instability from war debt, both have social inequality. And also, both started because of enlightenment ideas.
Hope this helps
Lincoln issued the first Emancipation Proclamation shortly after the Battle of Antietam. It would take effect January 1, 1863.
This did not effect any European power from formal recognition. least of all the world's most powerful empire with millions of "Native Peoples " under their control. One can call it forced labor. The British had already given the Confederacy "de facto " recognition as it had a constitution, a government and an army.
