Answer:
Fifth Amendment.
Explanation:
He exercised his right to remain silent.
The taiga is the world’s largest forest, so there is a lot of wood.
Answer:
For the excercise: While "Kitsch" refers to works that realistically depict easily identifiable objects and events in a pretentiously vulgar, awkward, sentimental, and often obscene manner, the purpose of "propaganda" is to persuade us to believe a specific message rather than have an artistic experience. 1.-Kitsch and 2.- Propaganda are the correct answers in the presented order.
Explanation:
To understand this answer we have to remember the concepts shortly and then analyze why they meant it. So in the first place, as described in the exercise "Kitsch" is an art style that is created in a very raw and unpolished regular format instead of giving it the polished high art style we are used to observing in the artwork. It is a dark humoristic art style and its main purpose is to make fun of some things by being ironic and clinic. On the other hand, Propaganda is much more a different kind of production. First of all, it is not considered an art category but it is considered a source of media use to sensitize, create awareness, and persuade the public about a certain topic, make it adopt the propaganda's posture and create empathy or supportive behavior.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
<span>France Allied with American Colonies</span>
