The correct answer is B. Giving to charity
A and B are incorrect because they're not part of the 5 pillars. Finding ways to help other who are not as lucky as you is. Living in Mecca is not one of the pillars, but traveling to Mecca at least once in a lifetime is.
Answer:
A - a belief that 'Big labor' had becom corrupt, fueled by Republican rhetoric.
Explanation:
In the beginning, labor unions fought for the rights of the workers (more pay, better/safer work conditions). Over time some of them have become corrupt, making more money for themselves than the workers - this led to a suspicion that all unions were corrupt, leading to a decline in membership and therefore power.
Answer:
The South feared that the North would take control of Congress, and Southerners began to proclaim states' rights as a means of self-protection.
Explanation:
Answer: Slavery. At the heart of the divide between the North and the South was slavery. ...
States' Rights. The idea of states' rights was not new to the Civil War. ...
Expansion. ...
Industry vs. ...
Bleeding Kansas. ...
Abraham Lincoln. ...
Secession. ...
Activities.
Explanation:
Of the many provisions in the treaty, one of the most important and controversial required "Germany [to] accept the responsibility of Germany and her allies for causing all the loss and damage" during the war (the other members of the Central Powers signed treaties containing similar articles). This article, Article 231<span>, later became known as the War Guilt clause. The treaty forced Germany to disarm, make substantial territorial concessions, and pay </span>reparations<span> to certain countries that had formed the Entente powers. In 1921 the total cost of these reparations was assessed at 132 billion marks (then $31.4 billion or £6.6 billion, roughly equivalent to US $442 billion or UK £284 billion in 2017). At the time economists, notably </span>John Maynard Keynes, predicted that the treaty was too harsh—a "Carthaginian peace<span>"—and said the reparations figure was excessive and counter-productive, views that, since then, have been the subject of ongoing debate by historians and economists from several countries. On the other hand, prominent figures on the Allied side such as French </span>Marshal Ferdinand Foch<span> criticized the treaty for treating Germany too leniently.</span>
