1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleks [24]
4 years ago
7

Native born spanishards who held all the important positions in government we known as

History
1 answer:
Archy [21]4 years ago
5 0

yup i dont know thats just a lil bil awkard ummmmmmmm yea

You might be interested in
Explain the geographic relationship with the election of 1796.
Artemon [7]

Answer:

George Washington, who had been reelected in 1792 by an overwhelming majority, refused to run for a third term, thus setting a precedent for future presidents. In the presidential election of 1796, the two parties—Federalist and Democratic-Republican—competed for the first time. Partisan rancor over the French Revolution and the Whiskey Rebellion fueled the divide between them, and Federalist John Adams defeated his Democratic-Republican rival Thomas Jefferson by a narrow margin of only three electoral votes. In 1800, another close election swung the other way, and Jefferson began a long period of Democratic-Republican government.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Mohandas Gandhi sought to promote nationalism in India based on A) Hindu principles. Eliminate B) Islamic principles. C) nonalig
Fantom [35]
The correct answer to this is D. 
4 0
3 years ago
Pls help will<br> mark brainliest:)
Tamiku [17]

1st one tbh if you dont like that answer do the 2nd one

3 0
2 years ago
What was NOT an effect of the Renaissance? a)there was a new spirit of adventure b)trade assumed greater importance than before
kaheart [24]

Answer: C) Native Americans were eliminated by diseases

Explanation:

The Renaissance took place in Europe around the 14th century, while colonization in the Americas did not occur until several centuries later.

4 0
3 years ago
How did the objectives of auschwitz ii differ from auschwitz iii?
barxatty [35]

Auschwitz II-Birkenau and Auschwitz III-Monowitz were two different concentration camps that had different purposes and objectives.

Auschwitz II-Birkenau was the most infamous of all three Auschwitz camps. It was the one that was specifically made for killing, for performing genocide over the people that the German officials didn't thought deserve to live. This was the camp where the Jews were killed, accompanied by the Gypsies, and later by Slavic people, mostly people from the Soviet Union and Poland.

Auschwitz III-Monowitz was a camp with different purpose. The prisoners in this camp were not systematically killed, bu instead they were used as a labor force. The prisoners in this camp were overworked, they suffered from malnutrition, and had terrible conditions for living. Lot of them died because of those things, not because of direct murder. This prisoners were used as labor force for the rubber factory.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vietnam cause controversy at home and abroad?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is the delta region to the north called "lower Egypt"?
    14·2 answers
  • The industrial revolution turned most countries toward what new economic system
    9·1 answer
  • The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees:
    6·1 answer
  • Why did Mr. Kamkwamba have extra time to read when he was not helping on the farm?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the importance of the meetings of the Second Continental Congress?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is school painful?
    12·2 answers
  • What does the word "concentrate" most closely mean as it is used in paragraph 8?
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me I really need help
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answers.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!