1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SashulF [63]
3 years ago
12

Which of the following best summarizes why the Missouri Compromise needed to be replaced by the Compromise of 1850?

History
1 answer:
Llana [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Congress decided that the people should be able to decide whether the territory gained in the Mexican-American War should be allowed to have slavery of the following best summarizes why the Missouri Compromise needed to be replaced by the Compromise of 1850

You might be interested in
What were the results of increased production in the united states during world war i? whap ch. 29?
docker41 [41]
It i war and we gatta win, 
8 0
3 years ago
Where was franklin d Roosevelt during world war 2<br> [what state was he in]
blondinia [14]

Answer:

Franklin D. Roosevelt was in his second term as governor of New York when he was elected as the nation’s 32nd president in 1932.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain one way in which ideas of causes of disease remained the same between 1450 to present day ?
tia_tia [17]
We still think that direct exposure to filth/decay can give us diseases and it’s probably true.
6 0
2 years ago
Why did companies rely on the Irish?
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

Ireland has a mixed economy.

Explanation:that is why

3 0
3 years ago
What it Abraham Lincoln had not been killed by John Wilkes Booth? How would
stira [4]

Answer:

If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did american leaders believed it was important to keep the philippines?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the Second Continental Congress vote twice on the Declaration of Independence? A- It wanted a unanimous vote. B- It was
    12·2 answers
  • Which book, written by Desiderius Erasmus, criticized Catholic Church officials for focusing on money and power instead of the s
    11·2 answers
  • Details of Andrew johnson presidency
    14·1 answer
  • This was held in Washington D. C. on February 4, 1861.
    9·2 answers
  • What is the meaning of no armed force​
    15·1 answer
  • Which was a reason some Americans opposed ratification of the U.S. Constitution? It appointed a president-for-life. It gave wome
    15·1 answer
  • What would happen if Germany had won World War I? (I am just curious)
    12·2 answers
  • The "delicate balance of law" tries to maintain a fair balance between
    6·1 answer
  • WHY DID THE MUSLIM WAY OF PRAYING LEAD TO ADVANCES IN ASTRONOMY?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!