1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nikitich [7]
3 years ago
5

What it Abraham Lincoln had not been killed by John Wilkes Booth? How would

History
1 answer:
stira [4]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

If President Lincoln hadn't been assassinated, I believe that Reconstruction and the post-war era would have been more historically positive and ambitious. I think Lincoln would have achieved more things politically and socially for America, and would have done more to fight against many injustices in this country. Andrew Johnson did not have a positive presidency, says his impeachment. Lincoln had plans, but Andrew Johnson created policies and actions that went against the Republican Party and angered many, like his pardoning of Southerners. Lincoln would have continued to be a great figure for his party and I believe would have provided more as leadership than Johnson. If he was not assassinated, I believe that Lincoln would have continued his legacy and his fight for justice in America.

You might be interested in
Explain the major differences between the North and the South that led to the Civil War.
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

The North wanted the new states to be “free states.” Most northerners thought that slavery was wrong and many northern states had outlawed slavery. The South, however, wanted the new states to be “slave states.” They didn't want to give up their way of life

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For two months, the Senate debated what executive department should run the Freedmen’s Bureau. What reasons were given in suppor
Norma-Jean [14]

The correct answers are A) The War Department had more experience than any other agency and C) Military power was needed to protect former slaves.

For two months, the Senate debated what Executive department should run the Freedmen’s Bureau. The reasons that were given in support of granting oversight to the Department of War were "The War Department had more experience than any other agency and Military power was needed to protect former slaves.

For sixty days, the bill was debated in the Senate. They were discussing the department that should operate the Freedmen’s Bureau. Some of the Senators supported the idea that the <u>Department of Treasury was the one because Congress had given the Treasury department the control of confiscated land</u>. But the majority of Senators considered that the <em>Department of War had more experience than any other agency in the government and had the soldiers and weapons to protect the African Americans who had been slaves. </em>

6 0
4 years ago
Jim Crowe laws created obstacles to civil rights for minorities by
Usimov [2.4K]
Making it harder for them to fully achieve their potential
6 0
3 years ago
What conflict exists between Abigail and Proctor?
zmey [24]

<u>Conflict between Abigail and Proctor:</u>

When the play begins, is the Abigail's obvious animosity toward Elizabeth Proctor, John's wife.  In Act One, the pair discusses their past relationship as well as Abigail's continued devotion to John, also to his admission that he still have feelings for her too.

But John doesn't get mad until Abigail begins to criticize his wife at that time, and started quoting but before she  ends saying it John cuts her off. However, Abigail continues, She is defiling my name in the village!  She is telling lies about me!  She is a cold, snivelling woman, and you tend to bend to her! John threatens to whip her.

John's continued feelings for Abigail created conflict between himself and Elizabeth in Act Two, when he hesitated to tell the magistrates what Abigail had said to him about Betty's illness having nothing to do with witchcraft.  The conflict between John and Abigail revives when Abigail tries to frame Elizabeth for the claimed witchcraft .

8 0
3 years ago
explain the difference between a fact and an opinion, and then provide one example of a fact and one example of an opinion.
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

A fact is something proven with a source and a background and an opinion is a idea that has no support behind it

Explanation:

A fact is something proven with a source and a background and an opinion is a idea that has no support behind it

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • England's new system of justice included all of the following EXCEPT:
    13·1 answer
  • Which organization provides assistance to mothers and children living in poverty? WHO UNICEF World Bank Security Council
    15·2 answers
  • What contacts did most plains Indians have with white people before 1850?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Why did the British begin to intervene in the economic affairs of the
    15·1 answer
  • Baby Kayla do u have pad let
    6·1 answer
  • Please help meeeeeeeee
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP FAST
    7·1 answer
  • List 5 majors battles in which john bell hood commanded confederates troops
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following led to the passage of the Reconstruction Act of 1867. A) the election of Ulysses S. Grant as president. B
    13·2 answers
  • Where did the Russian word "tsar” come from?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!