Answer:
What was the colonist' response to the change in British policies in the 1760s? They were angry that they were being taxed without any representation in British parliament, which lead to the Boston Massacre, the Boston Tea Party, the Intolerable Acts and then the Revolutionary war.
The term intermediate here refers to the fact that during these times Egypt<span> was </span>not<span> a unified political power, and thus was “in-between” powerful kingdoms. Even </span>before<span> the </span>Old<span> Kingdom period, the foundations of </span>Egyptian civilization<span> were being laid for thousands of years as people living near the </span>Nile<span>increasingly focused
</span>
In the cartoon above, the men represent the Nativists group that called for limiting immigration.
The political strategy of promoting or defending the interests of native or indigenous residents above those of immigrants, especially the backing of immigration-restrictive laws, is known as nativism.
People in nativist groups sought to stop immigration. Their campaign was directed at those groups that might alter the course of established American culture.
The most frequently cited justification for immigration limits is the need to shield American workers from poverty. The mechanism is straightforward: Without these rules, the labor supply would significantly expand, resulting in a sharp decline in American wages to Third World levels.
Because the majority of Americans supported nativism, limitations on immigration were also popular.
To learn more about immigration refer to:
brainly.com/question/13688875
#SPJ9
Answer:
Peace is the state of being free from disturbance.
Genuine “world peace”–meaning effective consensus regarding shared sacrifices as well as voluntary cooperation–is theoretically possible.
But “world peace” imposed by a dominant power assisted by a few partners is unlikely because global power is becoming increasingly diversified and contentious.
Worldwide peace is most likely only some decades from now, when threats to humanity’s existence generated by global warming, pollution, etc., become an imminent threat to all.
In brief, only world peace driven by a recognition of the threat to everyone’s survival is the most likely source of salvation for a shortsighted humanity currently not able to see and think beyond the immediate.
