<span>Latino Civic and Political Participation I believe? </span>
a) Abolitionists were everything from abusive to humanitarians, according to Potter. Holt, on the other hand, was a professor so he provided a more lucid interpretation of the Civil War, as a matter of fact, Holt sees the conflict as a breakdown in America's democratic political process.
b) Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
The Persian Wars began when Athens and Persia fought over control of Ionia. This struggle between both nations to gain control over Ionia eventually led to a full-scale war between the small city-state of Athens and the Persian empire.
Answer:
A. Many were discontented with their domestic lives and duties and looking for opportunities to develop their talents.
Explanation:
The baby boom and rise of suburban life led to widespread discontent in the lives of middle class white women during the 50s and 60s.
In contrast to the wartime jobs that many women held during WW2, women in the 50s and 60s were stay at home moms.
They spent most of their time at home, and women that did work received much lower pay then men.
Women at home became discontent and wanted equality, with more opportunities for education and work.
So, the correct answer is A.
