According to the establishment clause, how would a historical society's posting of the Ten Commandments along with the history o
f religion and its beliefs and practices be viewed? The posting would be in violation of the clause because religious items cannot be put in public places. The posting would be in violation of the clause because the items relate to a particular religion. The posting would not be in violation of the clause because there is a learning purpose to the items. The posting would not be in violation of the clause because people willingly go to the historical society.
According to the establishment clause, how would a historical society's posting of the Ten Commandments along with the history of religion and its beliefs and practices be viewed?
C. The posting would not be in violation of the clause because there is a learning purpose to the items.
The correct answer is C) the posting would not be in violation of the clause because there is a learning purpose on the items.
<em>According to the Establishment Clause, a historical society's posting of the Ten Commandments along with the history of religion and its beliefs and practices could be viewed in the following way. The posting would not be in violation of the clause because there is a learning purpose on the items. </em>
The Establishment Clause that appears in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits Congress to establish an official religion. Under this legislation, nobody can pass a law to give preference to any religion. So the posting would not be in violation of the clause because there is a learning purpose on the items. No one is forcing nothing.
The international community respected America as a legitimate global power.
Explanation:
The fact that both Russia and Japan accepted the United States as a mediator implies that they saw it as a legitimate global power , a prestigious international actor. Roosevelt was acting for the American interests, too, it must be clearly understood: peace and stability in Asia were good for American trade and economic interests in the Far East.
The differences between the piety of 19th century Protestants (revivals), and 17th century Puritans and 18th century deists (some founding fathers) is discussed below in details.
Explanation:
The Puritanism that occurred under those such as the Mathers is a perfect, wholly contrived, rather round concept that consisted of five separate agreements.
The most important difference is that they considered predestination whereas the present Protestant has adopted Salvation by Grace.
Puritans held the view that individuals were not created similar, and certain selves were decided for bliss, while others were not to be as blessed.
On the other hand, Deists were strong devotees in the idea that every person was created equal.
