Answer: The challenges of immigration are, more often than not, negotiated in the context of the family (Carranza 2001). Therefore, research in family studies needs to encompass the family as a unit of analysis as well as the patterns of resistance that family members develop in order to bounce back in an unwelcoming environment.
Explanation: A purposive sample was chosen in order to provide some diversity to the range of the accounts regarding mother–daughter negotiation. The purposive sample provided richness along many dimensions such as socio-economic-political religious affiliations, migration paths, etc. The sample design was fairly complex involving two sets of participants. Each of the two sets included mothers and their daughters. Participants in these sets were interviewed individually.These two sets were: (i) The Mother–Adolescent
Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adolescent daughters between the ages of 15 and 17 years who were born in Canada or abroad; and (ii) The Mother–Adult Daughter Set which included Salvadorian immigrant mothers and at least one of their adult daughters between the ages of 19 and 30 years who grew up in Canada or arrived before becoming an adolescent. Mothers and daughters in these two groups were interviewed individually because ‘in-depth interviews provided the possibility to learn to see the world from the eyes of the person being interviewed’ (Ely 1991, p. 58). These in-depth conversations allowed obtaining information about the participants’ individual perceptions regarding their positioning as they settled into Canadian context.
To learn more about racism and immigration refer:-
brainly.com/question/8308669?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ2
They agreed to count each slave as 3/5 of a person.
In the United States on the East Coast- New York, Boston, Charleston, Norfolk.
Answer:Cartoon depicting the European great powers — Britain, France, Russia, Germany, and Austria-Hungary — struggling to stop the conflict in the Balkans from boiling over into something much bigger and much worse, 1912-1913. Crises over the Balkans were not new — they had been a semi-regular occurrence in European diplomacy since the Greek War of Independence in the 1820s began the slow process of eroding Ottoman control over the region.
The resulting power vacuum encouraged Russia, Austria and other great powers to try to move in to fill it either by supporting the creation of new states like Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria or taking territory directly (such as Bosnia-Herzogovina, annexed by Austria-Hungary in 1908). But equally important was the need of the European great powers to try and stop each other from gaining too much influence or power in the region as the Ottomans withdrew. Balancing these two often conflicting goals required very delicate diplomacy and was not helped by the emergence of the new Balkan states, like Serbia and Bulgaria, which were quite capable of turning the tables on those powers who sought to manipulate them as regional clients.
By the first decade of the new century many European leaders and diplomats were convinced that the next major European war would begin in the Balkans. The outbreak of the Balkan wars seemed to many observers in the press to be the much-predicted spark that would cause a wider war.
Answer:
Explanation:
A follower of Islam is called a Muslim, which in Arabic means “one who surrenders to God.” The Arabic name for God, Allah, refers to the same God worshiped by Jews and Christians. ... The Muslim community comprises about 1 billion followers on all five continents, and Islam is the fastest-growing religion in the world.
