Answer:
The investigador should: Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
An investigator's ethical duty, is to keep the subject of investigation, well informed with all the details about the invesigation. At a phase 2 of the study the subject suposposedly has been informed of the prosedure, following the informed consent. So in this particular case the investigator has to present all the new information so the subject can decide for himself what is best for him.
During phase II of an investigation, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits or negative aspects of a drug, to ensure the safty and wellbeing of the subject. If a drog is known to harm a subject, the procedure would stop. In this phase is important to have the data to decide and discuss what is best for the subject.
Answer:
Misperception
Explanation:
His perceptions of dreams are misplaced thereby making him realise that while climbing the mountain with intense urge of survival by being at the brink of death does not change the orientation of his view on his immediate environment.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Board of Education of Topeka, case in which on May 17, 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0) that racial segregation in public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits the states from denying equal protection of the laws to any person within their jurisdictions.
C. A Muslim submits to the will of Allah as they are a religious follower of Allah himself
Federal law states that 14-15 year olds cannot work over 8 hours a day, with no more than 3 hours on a school day, and over 40 hours a week, with no more than 18 hours per week while in school. Minors are also not allowed to work before 7am or after 7pm respectively.
hoped that helped"P
