Try one country at a time.
First explain the countries healthy standards individually.
Then compare and contrast the two countries together.
That should help you start off!
Just keep sharing ideas and facts + blending in your own opinions on the matter.
Good luck! :D
Faizula is a wonderful man with a big heart of kindness. He is very faithful with his religion and begins to follow it strictly. But this kind hearted soul sometimes forgets the littlest things in life. When he encountered the man selling roses, it symbolizes the simplicity of one's life. It takes one act of kindness to create a loop.
Your answer is c. your welcome
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
For occupational exposure, the limit is 50 mSv in a single year with a maximum of 100 in a consecutive five-year period, and for the public to an average of 1 mSv (0.001millisievert ) of effective dose per year, not including medical and occupational exposures. japan aloso has one of the one disaster radiation active matiorals are sill there be
