Answer:
Covering parts of what is now northern Ethiopia and Eritrea, Aksum was deeply involved in the trade network between India and the Mediterranean (Rome, later Byzantium), exporting ivory, tortoise shell, gold, and emeralds, and importing silk and spices
Explanation:
Happy to assist you! If you have any questions or comments, Please comment in the boxes below! Have a wonderful day!
-Alaska
Answer:
Greg's and Allen's bodies metabolize the alcohol differently.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, the most likely reason for them to have two different reactions to the alcohol is that they metabolize the beer differently. Every individual could have different reactions depending their own context (for example if they ate or not before, if they are tired or stressed or not, etc.) but the most common explanation of this is that Allen drinks beer or alcohol more often than Greg and he developed tolerance to some of it's effects. Therefore, their metabolism works differently.
Sorry can’t help you with this maybe an expert can...
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court affected the US citizens' right to freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Charles Schenck was the general secretary of the US Social Party. Socialists were against the world war that was occurring at the time since they believed that the US involvement only benefited the rich. The poor soldiers were the ones who were sent to fight. As a result, socialists also urged US workers to oppose the war. Schenck participated in many anti war activities and he mailed leaflets to soldiers trying to convince them of resisting the draft. As he violated the Espionage Act, because he caused insubordination in the military forces, he was convicted. However, after being tried, Schenck argued that his right to freedom of speech protected by the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution had been violated. The Espionage Act limited the freedom of speech in times of war. For the Court, Schenck's actions had put other people at risk. As a result, in wartime reasonable limits can be put the 1st Amendment's provision governing freedom of speech.
