1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
3 years ago
8

This is civics. We dont have a section for it but i need help

History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
4 0
A. I don't believe this is the answer, because if you cannot afford a lawyer, it is obviously because you have financial problems, which a bank probably won't trust you with the loan.

B. I don't believe this is the answer, because this is unconstitutional, depending on the crime committed and other factors.

C. I believe this would be the correct answer, because t<span>he duty of a </span>public defender<span> is to defend people who cannot afford to hire a lawyer, the public defender is paid for by public funds.

D. This isn't the answer, because a district attorney </span><span>is an official who represents a county, city or a state in criminal court matters. A district attorney will never be on your side.

If this helped, please mark me brainliest, thank you and if you need more help, feel free to message me!
</span>
You might be interested in
The legacy of Sargon of Akkad was that he was the first to employ an extensive administration to govern his regional empire. Gro
Zarrin [17]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Can someone help me plzzz!!
cluponka [151]

Answer: number one,number two and number three

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
please help fast!! How did Social Darwinism start to move this country from capitalism to socialism?​
notka56 [123]
The theory that taught only the strong survived
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement about Rome at the end of the Punic Wars is true?
natima [27]

Answer:

The answer is D.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. What was the issue in the Supreme Court case of Plessy v. Ferguson? What did the court rule?
amid [387]

The judgment of the United States' Supreme Court in the trial Plessy V Ferguson resentfully transformed the living aspect of Blacks in the United States, as the ruling in the case made the state-sponsored segregation constitutional.

In the year 1896, the Supreme court commanded in a case Plessy v. Ferguson that the policy of the Whites of segregating the Blacks in the public facilities is fair. Therefore, the Plessy V. Ferguson verdict authorised the segregation sponsored by the state.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 significant?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the united states exert influence in japan?
    12·1 answer
  • Which best explains an effect of the Diaspora on Jewish people?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain why the Silk Road was a cultural diffusion
    9·2 answers
  • FIRST AND BEST ANSWER GETS A BRAINLIEST!!
    15·1 answer
  • I need help pls and ty
    8·1 answer
  • The migration of rural residents to Oklahoma’s towns and cities after World War II and through the 1980s and 1990s has reduced p
    13·2 answers
  • How did the war with Japan, Bloody Sunday, &amp; Rasputin lead to the fall of the Czar?
    10·1 answer
  • What does it mean to be "born without record"?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT characteristic of Neanderthals? A. Living in small huts B. Caring for the sick C. Larger brain siz
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!