According to Stephen Covey, when you use a win paradigm, parties in potential conflict work together to develop new solutions that make them all winners.
Explanation:
Paradigm is a philosophical model that contains set of concept and patterns, methodology etc. It has instinct of impress anyone's self confidence. When someone use win paradigm parties who are in conflict work they together develop new solutions that make them all winners.
That means it develops self esteem, confidence which lead them towards success. As paradigm contains models, self concept so anyone can put forward his views about certain thing. That's why Stephen Covey emphasized win paradigm.
When civilizations share two languages, bilingualism typically occurs along country borders, option B is the <u>correct</u> answer.
<h3>What is Bilingualism?</h3>
Bilingualism is defined as the presence of multiple languages in a country, state, or community.
Bilingualism improves cognitive capacities, and bilinguals are more creative and adaptable.
They are more open-minded, and they find it easier to focus on multiple things at the same time.
If two countries are not on good terms, embargoes, xenophobia, and sanctioning may occur.
For more information about language sharing, refer below
brainly.com/question/2465059
Answer:
Inattention is generally caused by concentration on emotional issues.
Explanation:
Hi Ramzey
Answer: B
A legislature passes a bill that must be approved by voters
Hint: A referendum is a process that allows citizens to approve or reject a law by a legislature .
Good luck buddy , I hope that's help !
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
