Answer:
Post Conventional.
Explanation:
In agreement with the Piaget's theory of moral development, Kohlberg developed the theory of the Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development.
<u>This theory categorised the development of morality in three levels namely Pre-conventional, Conventional, and post-conventional morality</u>.
In the given case, Kai is at the post-conventional morality stage.
In this stage, the morality of the individual is based on self-chosen principles. Their morals are grounded on the principles of rights and justice.
The morals of Kai are based on the principle of rights and justice and thus is an example of post-conventional morality.
They each give voting rights to a group that did not previously have them.
Answer:
a. People work together to get the things they need
Explanation:
Specialization, which is the practice whereby different individuals do things they are good at individually at a given point in time is a practice tht has been in existence from time immemorial. <em>For the community in question, specialization of labour in the early communities helps them to work together in-order to get things they needed done on time as well as protect themselves from harm.</em>
Answer: positive reinforcement
Explanation:Reinforcement is defined as increase in a behavior. Reinforcement is usually positive or negative. Positve reinforcement is when needed or advantageous stimulus is added to increase ones behavior or character.
positive reinforcement entails adding a reinforcing stimulus to a behavior that empowes the behavior to occuror appear again in the nearby future. Example is when you reward a child for a performing a particular task, the child will love to do that particular task often so as to get the reward. This can help the child to have the behavior you want him to develop and most times even when there is no reward the childs behavior is altered or changed already to always perform that task.
A reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>D. The friend’s </u><u>insights</u> are valuable as peer testimony.
<h3>What is peer testimony?</h3>
Peer testimony is a testimony given by a person without the required specialist expertise in a particular matter.
Peer testimony serves as an assertion made by someone who has experience or knowledge of a particular matter. For example, your friend who has a brother with childhood Type I diabetes.
Thus, a reasonable view of the choice of using your friend as expert testimony is <u>Option D</u>.
Learn more about peer testimony at brainly.com/question/4214423