Answer:
<u><em>A universal law</em></u>.
Kant says that when trying to decide whether an action is morally permissible, we must ask if we can consistently will that the maxim of our action should become <u><em>a universal law.</em></u>
Explanation:
The moral concept in Kant drives from the idea of the universal law. According to him, humans must consider if their actions are good or bad if implies and are toward the world. If it is good for the world, it is morally acceptable. On the contrary, just forget. It's pretty simple on the surface, but when we analyze deeply we can see that moral is a complicated concept that is not easy to measure.
The stage in which faith becomes an active commitment, detached from the expectations of culture and others, is referred to as the stage of <span>individual-reflective faith</span>. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and the answer has actually come to your desired help.
Answer:
<h3>Substantive liberties limit what the government can do, while procedural liberties define how the government can act.</h3>
Explanation:
Substantive liberties are limitations on the power of the government. It restraints a government from using authoritative actions like infringement of fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion, etc.
Procedural liberties include legal procedures that a government must follow before making any decision. It also provides that every citizens are entitled the right to due process of law when charged with a crime.
Substantive liberties keep a check on the government while procedural liberties instruct the government to follow legal procedures.
