Answer:
A. Federal law always supercedes state law.
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case which held that the Congress of the United States of America had authority, jurisdiction and power to regulate any interstate commerce with respect to the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
In New York city, the state legislature granted a monopoly to Robert R. Livingston and Robert Fulton an exclusive navigation rights or privileges of operating on all New York state waters with boats that are being moved either by steam or fire, for a time frame of thirty (30) years. Aaron Orgedon was the governor.
In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall, ruled that in business disputes, federal law always supercedes state law. It held that the permission granted to the state, New York city was monopolistic and as such was not permitted.
Answer:
??
Explanation:
can you explain a little more further?
A. the empire was too large to keep united
The pioneering psychologist John Watson argued that psychologists should restrict their efforts to the study of observable behaviors.
A theory known as behaviorism, or behavioral psychology, contends that environment affects how people behave. The study and analysis of observable behavior is the most fundamental definition of behavioral psychology. The middle of the 20th century saw a significant amount of ideas impacted by this area of psychology.
Watson thought that the main focus of psychology should be on observable behavior in science. He is famous for his studies on the process of conditioning. Watson is also renowned for the Little Albert experiment, in which he showed how a toddler may be made to dread a stimulus that was initially neutral.
To learn more about observable behaviors here: brainly.com/question/13196625
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is A. developing new learning goals.
Explanation:
Alice, Natalie’s roommate, argues that computers can perform several complex tasks better and more accurately than humans. However, Natalie counters her argument by stating that humans alone are capable of DEVELOPING NEW LEARNING GOALS.
