John Marshall was the<span> fourth Chief Justice of the </span>United States.<span>The longest-serving Chief Justice and the fourth longest-serving justice in </span><span>U.S</span>
Answer:
The statement from this passage could be used as evidence to suggest that the Columbian Exchange benefited the Old World much more than the New World is letter B. Practically all of them will get into a page or two or ten about the decimation of American Indians, or a page about how important maize is when all European crops fail, and things like that.
Yes because the solders are geting tiered every day and the stamina is worse and worse. But the worst of all is moral
Option A, turkey is the right answer.
A long-term benefit of the Columbian Exchange was the improvement in the diet of the people of Europe. Not only the Europeans were benefited by the Columbus exchange but also the Native Americans benefited greatly from the technology that the Europeans brought over to the New World. Native Americans shared Turkeys, Alpacas and other items with Europeans which signifies a mutual relationship.<u> Colonial Exchange plays a substantial part in the history of America. </u>
<u>The three main types of city governments are council-mayor (which can come with a strong mayor or with a weak mayor), council-manager, and commission (though very few cities actually have commission forms of government). Each of these has strengths and weaknesses.The strength of the commission form of government is that it is very democratic and it allows very close attention to be paid to each aspect of city government. In this form, one commission member is elected to oversee each major aspect of government. That person can give his or her undivided attention to that aspect of government. Its weakness, though, is that there is no central authority.In the council-mayor system, the strength is that you have an elected central authority. This allows one person to be responsible to the people for the whole city government. The main problem with this system is that you can have a mayor who is elected for his or her political acumen but who is a terrible manager. Such a person can significantly harm the way the city is run.</u><span><u>In the council-manager system, you take care of this problem. The manager is a professional who knows how to run a city. This makes this system efficient. The problem is that it is less democratic because the manager is not elected by the people.</u></span>