Answer should be D. National Security. because National Security is a concept <span> that the government should protect its citizens</span>
Answer:
1. There are many potential reasons, including: competition over territory and resources, historical rivalries and grievances, and in self defense against an aggressor or a perceived potential aggressor. War arises because of the changing relations of numerous variables--technological, psychic, social, and intellectual. There is no single cause of war. Peace is an equilibrium among many forces.
2. Talk directly. Assuming that there is no threat of physical violence, talk directly to the person with whom you have the problem. ...
Choose a good time. ...
Plan ahead. ...
Don't blame or name-call. ...
Give information. ...
Listen. ...
Show that you are listening. ...
3. Usually people think that conflict cannot be solved by war, it should be solved with negotiations. ... These are things that cannot be determined by cooperation and negotiation talks. People must be hurt in order to solve issues; the end justifies the means. Hence war is a suitable mechanism to end conflict!
Explanation:
The true statement among the statements given is " Inner and outer planet composition supports the nebular theory because heavier elements condense close to the Sun, and lighter <span>elements condense at cooler temperatures". This is why terrestrial planets like Earth, Mars, Venus, and Mercury are closest to the sun and are very dense.</span>
In addition to the conflict, interactionist, and functionalist perspectives, a fourth sociological perspective on racial and ethnic prejudice is known as: <u>feminist theory</u>.
There are four main sociological perspectives on racial and ethnic prejudice. They are symbolic interactionism theory, social conflict theory, structural-functional theory and feminist theory.
One of the main sociological theories, the Symbolic Interactionism Theory, is based on how our interpersonal interactions and communal experiences convey various symbols and meanings.
Social conflict theory explains the inequality of classes, how human conduct is divided into two classes—the higher or powerful class and the inferior class.
According to structural-functional theory, society is a complex, linked system in which every component contributes to the overall functionality of the system.
Feminism fights for gender equality because it sees men and women as typically being treated unfairly in society. It's a common misconception that feminist movements are led by a gang of enraged women who want to rule over males.
To learn more about racial and ethnic prejudice refer
brainly.com/question/2811665
#SPJ4
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
