1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ICE Princess25 [194]
2 years ago
11

What did the Treaty of New York, Treaty of Fort Jackson, and Treaty of Indian Springs have in common? The Creeks gave up land in

exchange for money and protection, but the US government did little to stop settlers from pushing west. The US government stopped settlers from pushing west onto Creek land in exchange for ownership rights over some Indian land. The Creeks gave up some land to maintain their sovereignty, and the US government recognized the tribes as equals. The US government agreed to establish reservations for the Creeks as long as the Creeks promised to let settlers expand west.
History
1 answer:
PilotLPTM [1.2K]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The Creeks gave up land in exchange for money and protection, but the US government did little to stop settlers from pushing west.

Explanation:

The fight for land and belonging has been a constant source of discontentment between the Native Indians and the American government. The Creeks were one such native people who, like every other Native Indian, had to suffer at the hands of the United States government and try to find peaceful ways for them to have their own reservations.

But while there are numerous wars fought between the two, there are also numerous treaties signed to try to maintain peace and cordial relations. The <u>Treaty of New York (1790), the Treaty of Fort Jackson (1814), and the Treaty of Indian Springs (1825)</u> were some of the treaties signed between the two parties. And<u> one common factor of these treaties is that the Creeks were made to cede their lands in exchange for some money and protection from the government</u>. But while the Native Indians kept their part of the agreement, the<u> U. S. Government did not do much to keep their part and did not stop the flow of settlers</u> in the areas of the Native Indians.  

You might be interested in
What are some positive actions of peter the great ?
Zielflug [23.3K]
Peter the Great established St. Petersburg, his window on the west. He spread his ideas of westernization, and expanded the country.  

He also established beard laws, you had to pay a tax in order to keep your beard (not necessarily positive though)
3 0
2 years ago
What five revolutionary innovations made possible the Industrial Revolution? Give one example of each of these innovations, and
Over [174]

Answer:

analysis

Although Chinese culture is replete with lists of significant works or achievements (e.g. Four Great Beauties, Four Great Classical Novels, Four Books and Five Classics, etc.), the concept of the Four Great Inventions originated from the West, and is adapted from the European intellectual and rhetorical commonplace of the Three Great (or, more properly, Greatest) Inventions.[citation needed] This commonplace spread rapidly throughout Europe in the 16th century and was appropriated only in modern times by sinologists and Chinese scholars. The origin of the Three Great Inventions—these being the printing press, firearms, and the nautical compass—was originally ascribed to Europe, and specifically to Germany in the case of the printing press and firearms. These inventions were a badge of honor to modern Europeans, who proclaimed that there was nothing to equal them among the ancient Greeks and Romans. After reports by Portuguese sailors and Spanish missionaries began to filter back to Europe beginning in the 1530s, the notion that these inventions had existed for centuries in China took hold. By 1620, when Francis Bacon wrote in his Instauratio magna that "printing, gunpowder, and the nautical compass . . . have altered the face and state of the world: first, in literary matters; second, in warfare; third, in navigation," this was hardly an original idea to most learned Europeans.[30]

In the 19th century, Karl Marx commented on the importance of gunpowder, the compass and printing, "Gunpowder, the compass, and the printing press were the three great inventions which ushered in bourgeois society. Gunpowder blew up the knightly class, the compass discovered the world market and found the colonies, and the printing press was the instrument of Protestantism and the regeneration of science in general; the most powerful lever for creating the intellectual prerequisites."[31]

Western writers and scholars from the 19th century onwards commonly attributed these inventions to China. The missionary and sinologist Joseph Edkins (1823–1905), comparing China with Japan, noted that for all of Japan's virtues, it did not make inventions as significant as paper-making, printing, the compass and gunpowder.[32] Edkins' notes on these inventions were mentioned in an 1859 review in the journal Athenaeum, comparing the contemporary science and technology in China and Japan.[33] Other examples include, in Johnson's New Universal Cyclopædia: A Scientific and Popular Treasury of Useful Knowledge in 1880,[34] The Chautauquan in 1887,[35] and by the sinologist, Berthold Laufer in 1915.[36] None of these, however, referred to four inventions or called them "great."

In the 20th century, this list was popularized and augmented by the noted British biochemist, historian, and sinologist Joseph Needham, who devoted the later part of his life to studying the science and civilization of ancient China.[11]

Recently, scholars have questioned the importance placed on the inventions of paper, printing, gunpowder, and the compass. Chinese scholars in particular question if too much emphasis is given to these inventions, over other significant Chinese inventions. They have pointed out that other inventions in China were perhaps more sophisticated and had a greater impact within China.[6]

In the chapter "Are the Four Major Inventions the Most Important?" of his book Ancient Chinese Inventions, Chinese historian Deng Yinke writes:[37]

The four inventions do not necessarily summarize the achievements of science and technology in ancient China. The four inventions were regarded as the most important Chinese achievements in science and technology, simply because they had a prominent position in the exchanges between the East and the West and acted as a powerful dynamic in the development of capitalism in Europe. As a matter of fact, ancient Chinese scored much more than the four major inventions: in farming, iron and copper metallurgy, exploitation of coal and petroleum, machinery, medicine, astronomy, mathematics, porcelain, silk, and wine making. The numerous inventions and discoveries greatly advanced China's productive forces and social life. Many are at least as important as the four inventions, and some are even greater than the four.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
In the past we have always had a deep attachment for the ways of China and all of our institutions have been modeled upon those
Anarel [89]

The cultural borrowing is defined as an “imitation” of actions or habits between two or more social groups through contact, or information exposure.

In this passage of Wang Kŏn, we can appreciate his opinion about the national identity. Over the years, Corea was under the influence of countries such as China that is why it was customary to follow its models as a reference in many fields (economic, institutional, political, etc.).  Then arose the Wang' statement, who said this behavior was illogical because their situation was very different, his nation has other factors such as geographical location and type of population that make unjustified to pretend to do the same as other cultures.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the US government continue to use a reservation system for American in
KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

American Indian tribes were relocated to reservations in the 1850s because the federal government wanted "to give white settlers more land", however it is also true that many whites wanted the natives to have their own land, but this was not the primary reason.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is grassroots organizing considered a form of “indirect lobbying”
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Since direct lobbying is paying lobbyists to talk to representatives and make deals to pass legislation or protect legislation, indirect lobbying organizations uses their followers to call or write the representatives about the issues the voters want to see/legislation they want passed

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the opening to the Gettysburg Address, and then answer the questions.
    11·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • The development of medieval European cities was marked by improvements in health and safety practices. True or False
    6·1 answer
  • How did the chiming of the bell on July 8th, 1776, change the world?
    8·1 answer
  • According to the Constitution, the right of freedom of religion supports practicing religions that are national and official. pr
    8·2 answers
  • What two important civil rights<br> actions occurred during<br> Eisenhower's presidency?
    9·1 answer
  • The Spanish Armada was defeated because _____________.
    13·1 answer
  • which three statements regarding english colonial society reflect acceptance of religious freedom and diversity in american cult
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes how the Transcontinental Railroad affected
    10·2 answers
  • Why does De Bow feel that it is important to show that the Bible sanctions slavery?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!