1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
padilas [110]
3 years ago
14

Why Hindusm's development was more a social structure than a religion? Help plz!!

History
1 answer:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
7 0
This is because Hinduism was highly associated with the Caste System which was a social structure which India adhered to prior to its abolition. It states that the higher your caste, the more likely you are to be able to achieve moksha. If you are in a lower caste, it is because you recieved bad karma in your previous life. 
You might be interested in
Why did European colonist tolerate the way the congo s native residents where treated ?
hammer [34]
The colony was the source of their livelihood
5 0
3 years ago
Which roman was in power during the “great fire of rome” and was also suspected of starting it?
Mashcka [7]
The emperor was Nero.
8 0
3 years ago
The “Age of Knights” ended with the development of a weapon that was first used at the Battles of Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt
antoniya [11.8K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The “Age of Knights” ended with the development of a weapon that was first used at the Battles of Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt. This military innovation was the longbow.

This weapon was a long curved arc in the form of a "D." It was used by the knights in battles such as Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt. Other weapons were used in those armed confrontations as was the case of poleaxes, lances, and different kinds of swords.

We are talking about the turbulent years of the Hundred Years War that started in 1337 and ended in 1453. The War was confronted by Great Britain vs. France. The British won the war.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the Europe colonization of the Americas end up affecting the populations of three different continents?
DaniilM [7]

For Europeans, the effects were mostly positive. They experienced an overpopulation problem as well as monarchic and religious tyranny and were under the constant threat of Islamic invaders. One of the main reasons why Columbus wanted to find a way other than Cape of Good Hope to get to Asia was that Ottoman Turks had blocked all access to Asian trade and travel.

The Portuguese had a monopoly on the Good Hope route and this route was actually too long. When Columbus discovered the American Continent, he thought he had actually found Asia. In any event, Europeans found a land that they could conquer and colonize, they sent all their excess of people there. They found valuable raw materials as (timber, gold, silver, iron, etc.), spices, exotic fruits and vegetables (tomatoes, potatoes, avocados, etc.) and eventually used to Continent as a gateway to Asia.

For the Natives of the Americas, the effects were disastrous; most of them were wiped out by diseases unknowingly brought in by European explorers or colonizers. Several others were subjugated or even exterminated. Their most powerful empires were vanquished and conquered (Incas, Aztecs) and the land they had found several thousands of years ago became European. There were however, positive aspects in their disaster. They had access to Western civilization, science, culture and technology. They discovered Europe as much as Europe discovered them. Many of them discovered writing (many had already some form of writing but other indigenous cultures were exclusively oral). They also had access to the modern concept of nation-states (like the Five Civilized Tribes in the US).

For Black Africans, the results were mostly disastrous. They were captured or bought from other African slavers by European Slavers and suffered slavery for centuries before they were eventually integrated into society. However, they also enjoyed – though marginally -  some of the positive aspects mentioned earlier for natives of the Americas (access to Western civilization, science, culture and technology).


5 0
3 years ago
Can someone plz help me ? :(
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

b. The source us not credible because it contains more opinions than facts.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why would slaves revolt? Because they needed to organize. Because the emancipation societies promoted it. Because they wanted to
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following causes is not considered a political disruption to food distribution?
    11·1 answer
  • What other religions are represented in afghanistan?
    15·1 answer
  • Who was an astronomer during the Renaissance? Raphael Niccolo Machiavelli Johannes Kepler Mansa Musa
    8·2 answers
  • Under the leadership of Charles de Gaulle, what government was formed? a. Maquis c. Vichy b. Free French d. Nazi
    7·1 answer
  • To what parts of the world did Islam spread between the 7th and 17th centuries
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT an effect of the Industrial Revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • The colonists in the New World used enslaved African people as labor because
    9·1 answer
  • What foreign policy actions did John Quincy Adams take that reflected nationalism?
    11·1 answer
  • President Jefferson used his powers of the presidency to complete what major deal with France in 1803? The Louisiana Purchase Th
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!